9/11 South Tower Strike - Black Coverup From The East Zoomed (CNN-FOX)

This is supposed to be a silver plane with reflective morning sunlight hitting the visible side of the plane. The sun is behind the camera. This looks like a black sillouette coverup of the real object that hit the buildings. This camera angle and shot is in one of the NIST FBI releases, but this is edited out(?) of that video. Remember in every collision there is an equal and opposite force reaction, did that building hit the plane with the SAME quantity of force the plane hit the building with?

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• New
• FOIA
• FBI
• September
• 11
• 2001
• 911
• Flight
• 77
• Pentagon
• NYPD
• Port
• Authority
• Bush
• Cheney
• Clinton
• Al
• Qaeda
• Bin
• Laden
• Obama
• Pakistan
• CIA
• DOJ
• False
• Flag
• Coverup
• Commission
• Pennsylvania
• Staged
• Israel
• Taliban
• Terror
• terrorism
• Iraq
• Afghanistan
• NTSB
• British
• Construction
• Damage
• Plane
• Missile
• Demolition
• 757
• 767
• airplane
• Explosion
• Thermate
• Implosion
• Eyewitness
• NIST
• Thermite
• Investigation
• Science
• Physics
• Newton
• Galileo
• Engineering

[Xendrius]

Exactly what they planned in operation northwoods, to take a military 767 and paint hte tail section to resemple a commercial plane and then use it in a false flag attack.

[IranContraScumDid911]

@MissKatrina I am not drawing a final hologram conclusion. I dont know what flew through the air, or if something did. I do know for a fact it was not a Boeing size plane. The South Tower impact looks like a missile strike, no wake turbulance and at least 200 yards of powdered blasted concrete comes out the entry hole. Exit face explosion wrong for SSW approaches. The videos are all edited and come from the source that is feeding you a cavemen theory. Whoever tampered vids was a wing idiot?

[MissKatrina2010]

@IranContraScumDid911 OK So you are saying no planes at all - nothing flew through the air on 911? Seems kind of risky and stupid to not have anything fly through the air and hit the tower, whether plane, missile or drone hologram.. Why does 1 wing disapear in several shots at the same precise time (all black plane shots).

[IranContraScumDid911]

@MissKatrina Which shots are holograms? Not this shot, its an altered version of another shot. Sure looks like a hologram or a Boeing .... but its not. The missing wings, funny shape, engines sideways are video error. Somebody told you those were holograms, without any evidence to prove the technology was used or exists. I recommend thinking for yourself, prove everything you hear, everything. There are many bunk diversions, as you might have figured out. The live images were pooled, FBI fed

[MissKatrina2010]

@IranContraScumDid911 I am familiar with all of this and was a "no-planer". I agree, most of the footage is fake. But I continue to develop the idea that holograms were used, and are seen in SOME of the shots. A few shots we see the hologram, but most of what we see is fake video. A lot of times, you see the same plane problems (no wing, morph, upside down engines) in different shots - these are holograms. Don't bet 100% on one single truth breaking 9/11. My Ph. D. is in clinical psych.

[IranContraScumDid911]

@Katrina NO this video is a clip zoom edit of the Park Foreman video. The videos are all fake. Hologram? Is that the most likely? Thats science fiction. Test the videos with each other, you will see there are many different plane shots. The level from the south (like this), 15 degree decent from SSW (NBC and NY1), and a banked parabolic trurn oblique to the face (ABC). Were there three different planes and multiple holograms? The videos are fake, altered. What is your PHD in?

[MissKatrina2010]

@IranContraScumDid911 So you're saying it's a hologram then..

[IranContraScumDid911]

@MissKatrina2010 FDNY Victim and Equipment Recovery Maps ..... only 5 plane parts found at the WTC site by the firefighters. There is a physics issue with the planes. In every collision there is an equal and opposite force reaction on both objects equally in time. The detachable cantalevered weaker hollow wings failed to recieve the same force they delivered that made a hole. The energy available to make a hole is velocity and mass, neither lost the first instant of impact

[MissKatrina2010]

@IranContraScumDid911 I have concluded some of the video is fake. I confimed this in 2008 (sept clues). But trust me, it would be way too risky for there to be NO plane at all - to easy to crack the story - that's why holograms were used. There HAD to be a plane for the story to work, nobody said this plane had to be real. I do not disregard anyones observations over the past 10 years. It is through these previous observations that we can rule things out and continue to find the truth.

[IranContraScumDid911]

@MissKatrina2010 Observation is one of sciences greatest tools. Start with the most likely. Proof the plane videos, looking for individual flaws tested with the rest of the sample. The pooled ABC shot we all saw live came in LEVEL at an oblique angle to the south face from the south-south-west (statue of liberty) in a 30 degree banked turn to port (with no parabolic depth perspective). This video conflicts in small detail. 15 degree decent or level? I have videos of both.