'Plenty of poverty for all banks to tackle' - World Bank chief

There is plenty of poverty in the world in terms of investing in developing countries, there is no competition in this area the President of the World Bank Jim Yong Kim told RT in an exclusive interview.

RT LIVE http://rt.com/on-air

Subscribe to RT! http://www.youtube.com/subscription_c...

Like us on Facebook http://www.facebook.com/RTnews
Follow us on Twitter http://twitter.com/RT_com
Follow us on Google+ http://plus.google.com/+RT

RT (Russia Today) is a global news network broadcasting from Moscow and Washington studios. RT is the first news channel to break the 500 million YouTube views benchmark.

• Category

  News & Politics

[MongolDuu1]

People should search up, Confessions of an Economic Hit Man. Such a sad world we truly live in....

[Kinkspace]

The primary directive of the world bank is profit not people.

[AustralianLeprechaun]

Yes there's plenty of poor in the world and the evil world bank works tirelessly to increase the number of poor in the world!

[phil donahue]

I'll give it to him....hesss good. I even beleived him for a min haha

[MultiSamsoon]

The devils say one thing, but do right the opposite. Central bankers, who own WB, IMF, UN etc, are the real reason for poverty worldwide! Deceptions galore!

[MultiSamsoon]

Eliminating human pests using laws! For central bankers, all humans are pests! Happy slavery!!

[xcvsdxvsx]

Even a radical individualist like myself and a radical collectivist like yourself have WAY more in common than we have apart. Pro capitalism people are (usually) not heartless monsters who believe in survival of the fittest. we simply believe that there is good reason to believe that the problems that people like yourself have ascribed to capitalism are actually products of state interventionism and that REAL capitalism is the best/only way to solve the problems that we both want to see solved.

[xcvsdxvsx]

well actually im an anarcho-capitalist. that is a person who is both an anarchist but also pro capitalism (though i think we define capitalism differently than what you may be used to). And you are right, there are 2 types of communism. One type where the ruler violently forces his vision on his subordinates (like the ussr) and the one where everyone voluntarily chooses to be part of the commune. (see list of anarchist communes) I in no way oppose the latter.

[davisoneill]

I'm very glad to hear you are an anarchist rather than a capitalist. I'm a Communist, but I would still consider us basically on the same side.

[xcvsdxvsx]

Again you and i are in full agreement, the capitalism and the state can never co exist, it is totally imposable. This is a big part of why i consider myself an anarchist.

[davisoneill]

Yes, I fully agree that the corporations and the state now collaborate to maintain their power. But, its futile to imagine that you can have capitalism without that collusion between the state and those who own the wealth of a society. Politicians will always need donations, and it will always be easy for capital to "go on strike" if it doesnt get its way.