Since Kant talked about the analytic/synthetic a priori/a posteriori distinctions in Critique of Pure Reason, it has not been adequately objected until W.V. Quine published Two Dogmas of Empiricism. One dogma is analyticity because it is true statements that are true by virtue of meaning and independently of fact. He attacks meaning to conclude that the analytic/synthetic distinction has never been made.
Twitter:
http://www.twitter.com/cosmosz
Website:
http://cosmoszphilosophy.com
@DETROITSSAVIOR no problem. good luck on the paper!
BlueSpectacles 1 year ago
IM DOING A PAPER ON APRIORI VS A POSTERIORI AND YOU HAVE HELPED ME THANK YOU SO MUCH...IM TRYING TO FIGURE OUT HOW TO MAKE IT EIGHT PAGES WHILE PRESENTING ARGUMENTS...:) YOU HAVE ME IDEAS. THANK YU
DETROITSSAVIOR 1 year ago