See the driver? Yup, that's right... NO GUN! *

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
2,611,616
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 21, 2007

*ONE FRAME BEFORE THE FATAL HEAD SHOT

See the driver? Yup, that's right... NO GUN! This is for the select few who actually think the driver had something to do with the assassination. I don't think they bother to read the comments, so I am posting this video to show exactly how stupid the idea is.

(Oh, and sorry about the background noise)

==================================
If anyone is still skeptical, go here. It covers everything in detail.
http://www.jfklancer.com/greer.html
I don't agree with everything said on the rest of that site, but they do a good job discussing the "driver theory".
==================================

This is frame 312 of the Zapruder film, one frame before the fatal head shot. Here is the full frame http://www.assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z312.jpg

Here's the original site showing every frame of the Zapruder film
http://www.assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/

This is the image I used (if you want the picture in full resolution, send me a private message with your e-mail) http://i145.photobucket.com/albums/r220/altoidyoda/frame_312.jpg

Here is the close-up of the driver in the original resolution.
http://i145.photobucket.com/albums/r220/altoidyoda/driver_close-up.jpg

(This is just a temporary description, I will write a better (less angry) one once I get my thoughts together on the subject)

I've been discussing the assassination for the past couple of weeks and I keep seeing comments that claim that the driver fired the fatal shot. Can you believe that? That someone would actually think that the driver, in front of hundreds of witnesses, could pull out a gun and shoot the president in the head without anyone noticing? It is beyond me how someone could be so stupid to make that claim. But what's even worse is how people will look at that video and actually believe it's true. I've been amazed at what I've heard over the past two weeks. It's amazing to think that someone could give credit to any conspiracy theory, let alone something like this. This theory should be filed right next to the 'coughing up the bullet' idea, right into the trash. These people are worse than the average conspiracy theorists. Those guys will at least attempt to show some evidence (however stupid it is) to prove their point. These people, on the other hand, will just make stuff up, then they have the gull to argue over it, as if it's a real possibility. Well I've got a theory of my own, and I can prove it... Oswald did it! Alone. 3 shots from the 6th floor window. All the evidence supports it and if you refuse to believe the facts then you're not worth the time it takes to prove you wrong. And that's the thing, they wont be proven wrong. They didn't come to their conclusion rationally so no information will ever change their minds. That's the difference between a skeptic and a conspiracy theorist. One wants to know the answers, the other wants to be right.

...so anyway, this video is just to show people that a low resolution video on YouTube can't be used as a basis for their crackpot theories. It is a enlarged section of frame 312 of the Zapruder film, showing the driver, both his hands, and the glare of the guys head. Now that you've all seen this you can stop annoying me with stupid comments.

This is a link comparing the frame I show to the same frame in the video, "JFK Assassination: Watch The Limo Driver"
http://i145.photobucket.com/albums/r220/altoidyoda/frame_312_comp.jpg

And this is a link comparing the frame I show to the same frame William Cooper shows in the video, "Did The Driver Shoot JFK?".
http://i145.photobucket.com/albums/r220/altoidyoda/sidebyside2.jpg

This video shows object moving towards the shot when struck by a bullet.
http://www.zippyvideos.com/6161942937722266/physics_at_work

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • That's right people, stay in your ignorance. In this day and age when we are supposed to be "so smart", I find it ironic that you have all become so blind that the government doesn't even have to force feed you the lies. You just happily eat them up. Good luck if the latter describes you as an American citizen. Lord knows, your doomed country will need it.

  • this is bullshit!!! he still lives here ?? why dont the let it play in slowmotion??? because the gun need to come after this shot that they view here before the fatal shot let it see5 seconds before till 5 seconds after in slowmo you will see the driver has a gun pointing at JFK and just after he shoots he qwuikly turns his head to the front

see all

All Comments (8,276)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @lsudx479 the only reaction the driver is supposed to make in that situation is exelerate as fast as possible. protocol is that they never drive that slow. why? because when the car slowed down like that was when he was shot.

  • @NXmasterz DO YoU SAY THAT OSWALD KİLLED TO PRESİDENT ??

    BUT OSWALD's GUN WAS FOUND İN SİXTH FLOOR..

  • @SUSSTURUCU

    wrong again. no read closely so I don't have to write this over and over: go google it, go search wikipedia or go watch the national geographic docemantaire to know what really happenend. the murderer was sitting on the fifth floor of a bookstore building or whatever it's called and sniped the president with 2 of the 3 fired bullets. this has already been proven and is a 100% true. everything else like your story are all made up. now shut up

  • @NXmasterz FUCK YOU...

    THE KiLLER WAS SOMEBODY WHO WAS FROM CROWDED HAD USED THE GUN SHAPED PHOTO CAMERA...

  • @SUSSTURUCU

    you're one of those dumb fools who makes something up so that anyone could be the killer. just shut up, it's already been solved and the driver had nothing to fo with it. period.

  • the driver didnt do it thats just dumb.

  • but the 'shotgun' seat dude just sits there as the 'driver' turns 180 head.

  • wtf why can't i post!

  • The federal reserve bank killed JFK as revenge for issuing executive order 11110

  • Couldn't it just be that the driver turned out of reaction to the bang of the gun? Or maybe due to Gov. Connelly screaming in pain could have caught his attention. Both people were already hit in this still frame so that means a couple seconds had passed already. This picture doesn't prove the driver's involvement at all. This isn't evidence - it's a leap of imagination.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more