Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Debate: Moral Relativism v. Moral Absolutism - Part 3

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
588 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 21, 2010

Firestone vs. Gomberg in a debate on Moral Absolutism versus Moral Relativism.
Part 3: Firestone

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (4)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Gomberg is awful - he is more intent on proving he is a self loathing (hates white people)left leaning communist that has a chip on his shoulder.

  • Both these guys are idiots. Absolutist guys is making broad brush acusations. Relativist is borderline socialist beatnick. Why isn't there a moderate voice?

  • What straw man? All he said about the Nazis was that they took advantage of the lower classes, and that Gomberg's philosophy does the same.It's not a straw man if it's the truth.

  • ugh! Firestone is a better speaker unfortunately his logic is fraught with fallacious reasoning. He asserts relativism to Nazism, then proceeds to attack his strawman. He did the same in his opining statement as well. Its also funny that both seem to be playing the emotion card with the black people in the audience, I find that rather low, but the audience seems to be eagerly playing along.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more