Toyota vehicles in frontal moderate collisions that severly hurt people when the airbags did not deploy causing occupants to go hurling forward and in some cases even the seat belts did not hold. You be the judge, should they have deployed and would you have wanted to have been riding in these vehicles when they wrecked and had no airbags to protect youself from injury?
Oh, brother. What a blatant hatchet job. Sitting next to those Toyotas were other vehicles, every brand and model, without any negative implication at all. Vehicles, including Toyotas, are occasionally involved in accidents. That reality doesn't imply anything negative about Toyota or Toyota vehicles. If you don't like Toyota, fine. However, many millions (far outnumbering you) rate their Toyota vehicles very highly (reliability, customer satisfaction, etc).
stewartx5 2 months ago
Dude, the reason why the airbags didn't deploy is because the cars didn't hit hard enough for the airbags to deploy. If you looked up the people who were in those cars they would probably still be alive. And some of the pictures it was crashed from behind so of course the airbag wouldn't deploy. And the one about the Ford Taurus the Camry T boned them, so because the Camry didn't crush that much airbags weren't needed to deploy and in a Side Impact airbags must always deploy like in the Taurus.
counkev 9 months ago
Eso Ocurre mucho con el nuevo Hilux en CR
royarpo 2 years ago
no this happened in my local area not 2 long ago with a 2010
popscoop12 2 years ago
TOYOTA 5:5 SAFE
neguimate 2 years ago