Ken Buchanan vs Roberto Duran Round 1
Top Comments
All Comments (24)
-
DURAN was winning every round, Ken tried to get DURAN DQ because he was losing, he would never have beaten ROBERTO DURAN, DURAN an all-time great Buchanan a good fighter..
-
People always say Buchanan was throwing punches after the bell so the low blow was fine, if Buchanan had won the fight with a late punch though it would have been a disgrace. It's quite sad to see someone as great as Duran win like that I think, specially to a good fighter like Buchanan. He was better than that I think so why end a fight so desperately? Duran-Buchanan II would have been a good fight but I doubt it woulda been as close as this one, Ken had already peaked before this fight IMO.
-
Duran only 21 here,Buchanan was 27 and had all the experience to his advantage.Like the announcer said,"I dont think I ever seen Ken is so much trouble in his career".Ken too much holding but Duran was hungry for glory and he got it.
-
@SirHappyThe1st and then you woke up?
-
@xxdonaldqxx Ask Ken if he asked for one....
-
Whitaker V Buchanan
now that would be good.
-
This was one tough fight. Buchanan was a damned good fighter, but Duran was maybe the best LW ever.
-
I could never understand why Duran didn't give Buchanan a rematch. Duran fought everybody and never ducked anyone.
Duran was a force of nature back then, and Ken was made of stern stuff too
northeasttoffee122 2 years ago 8
Ken was one of the most technical boxer ever.
vicpur 2 years ago 5