BEYOND PETROLEUM ~BP~ OIL EATING MICROBES~GULF CLEAN-UP 6 WEEKS

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
4,362
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 30, 2010

Courtesy jbtutt13 ~ Subscribe. Texas Land Office and Texas Water Commission successfully used oil-eating microbes to clean up large spills in weeks. Microbes hunt down and eat the oil and leave only biodegradeable waste that is non-toxic to humans and marine life. Marshlands and beaches were pristine within weeks. Why isn't the news media convering this? Why isn't BP using something that isn't toxic to the environment ? (BP) Beyond Petroleum ? you would think oil eating microbes is right up BP's ally, I think they would rather use toxic dispersants, much be cheaper to their bottom line.

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (NWOIS666)

  • this has been known for decades... look up "The Oppenheimer Formula"....

    guess what? This simple solution is not viable for your "government" because that way there is not profit to be made... so let's just keep watching and pretending we are doing something about this disaster... the usual......

  • @naz23jordan  Its not a government its "GOOBERMENT" ! ! ! LOL

see all

All Comments (83)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • best regards

  • Why does this video make me feel like im in the sixtys?

  • they also have dessert.. lol

  • @edrubangura Don't believe me? Look up "9/11 TRUTHERS LOCKED UP FOR LIFE UNDER NEW US LAW"

    And don't attempt to place this on Bush's head when this shit is being implemented under Obama! Unless you'd like to tell me how that "change" is working out for ya!

  • @edrubangura BTW, for all your contemptible defense of Pussbama, how do you explain the appointment of his internet czar, Cass Sunuvabitchstein? THAT guy's a leftist wacko that wants to give animals LEGAL REPRESENTATION! Wanna know what else that evil asshole wants? To BAN conspiracy theories. In other words, FREE SPEECH (but I already know you yourself hate free speech)!!! And ONE of the conspiracy theories Obama's appointee wants to ban is 9/11 truth. How much you love Obastard now?

  • @edrubangura Oh my GAWD! You are one dumb diddly dipshit! I only said I'm open-mindedly on the fence about 9/11 truth, and you spooge a bunch of Gawdawful STUPID everywhere, saying I'm not a libertarian! Perhaps you didn't notice that I never called truthers liars! And it looks like you COMPLETELY missed my saying, "both sides of the story have compelling points." Did you miss that? Did that little detail escape your attention? Yes, yes it DID! WTC7 is a compelling argument FOR foul play.

  • @edrubangura Why do you say "white" all the time? Should be ashamed of my color? OH! You think I get some kind of special treatment...like affirmative action, or something. Well, you're fucking wrong. I can't even get a credit card due to NO credit, which is fine by me! No debt by my own actions! And the subPRIME (not "sublime") mortgages have been part of the problem. It's not just the rescission of regulations! It's democrats bullying banks into lending to low-income/high risk borrowers.

  • @QuartuvLarry

    I rest my case you are fucking ignoramus! You are just a white tea bagger and not a libertarian. Interesting that you are a member of "We are Change" and yet you never investigated the crimes of century and get to the conclusion about 9/11 being an inside job.

    Godd bye, Tea Bagger!

    Explain the evenly/symmetrically collapse of Building 7 in its own footsprints.

  • @QuartuvLarry

    This shows why you are a sheeple, a fucking republican.

    Most white republicans always think a white government can't murder its own citizen, because the white government has always been feeding you the goods and taking care of you as a white man with access to white privilege such as getting access to good loans, not sublime mortgages and so on. And that's the reason why you are confused with a black man as a Commander in Chief and you think he cares less of usa interests.

  • @edrubangura Ah. Truthing. The reason Van Jones was fired. I don't say either way because both sides of the story have compelling points.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more