Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Swine Flu VIRUS patented in 2008.

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
9,567
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 8, 2009

Dr T Ott has found in the US patents office a patent for the swine flu virus. The patent is owned by none other than Medimmune who stands to profit around $151 million dollars from US taxpayers. Medimmune applied for and received the patient in 2008. Medimmune are guilty of all the deaths so far caused by this virus. The company must be charged and someone, probably many someones need lifetime prison sentence.

The WHO declared this to be a previously unseen virus.
It is impossible that the WHO would not be aware of this patent.

Patent Link
http://www.google.com/patents?id=EGSoAAAAEBAJ&printsec=abstract&zoom=...

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 4 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (kraken45)

  • nut job

  • Fully aqgree--Only NUT Jobs would patent a virus.

Top Comments

  • Just today at school, pamphlets were passed out informing parents the swine flue vaccine can be inhaled by their children in a mist... it will cut down on injection site abnormalities, its less painful and children will be more willing to inhale as appose to taking an injection...

    That is so thoughtful. They just love our little darlings.

  • A French scientists has reported on his website that he has received information from the French overseas departments and territories (DOM-TOM) that the French military have been told to prepare for forced vaccinations and the arrest of demonstrators.

    Who is really instructing these government traitors?

    It is imperative that we find out as we need to know who to lynch when our kids start dying.

Video Responses

This video is a response to Morgellons In Chemtrails PROVEN
see all

All Comments (148)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Irrespective of the engineered 'controversy' over the legitimacy of the patents of these man made viral weapons/'antidotes' we suffered from these symptoms for a couple of years now. The symptoms invariably increased in scale & frequency in direct correlation to the scale & frequency of the aerial, naval & land aerosol attacks at that time & which persist (with varying symptoms, toxic/carcinogenic metals, chemical & biological/nano - bio - polymer components today Feb 8th, '11.

    Beware Divide Con

  • Here in Victoria (Vancouver Island), British Columbia Canada we'd been sprayed heavily from the sky until around Aug 15th, 2010 when we witnessed & filmed the US/Canadian military? releasing aerosol banks from land/sea ('fog') sky (chem 'cloud'). These aerosol banks increased in frequency & scale several hundred percent between then & the first weeks of school @ 8:30 am as documented in my videos.THESE AEROSOL BANKS CARRIED WHAT SEEMED TO BE H1N1 SYMPTOMS WITH THEM; THEY ALSO MADE THE SKIN CRAWL

  • @kraken45 I can explain to you how to see for yourself that 2009/H1N1 is NOT in the patent mentioned. It is NOT. You can use Patentlens and BLAST to check for yourself that the gene sequences in Mediumme's patent are NOT similar to 2009/H1N1. The Mediumme patent does not have gene sequences listed from 2009/H1N1. Ott is either lying or has no idea as to what he's talking about.

  • @silkcat51 No, Medimmune's patent is NOT a patent for 2009/H1N1. See my comment and use BLAST at patentlens. If you're not competent to understand BLAST, then ask someone you know with a degree in biology / biochem / chemistry, because it is EASY to demonstrate that these claims are false.

  • @kraken45 "I do not think he would put his reputation at risk for something so easily disproven by anyone with a scientific background" Well, I think people are stupid for believing him because anyone familiar with genetics and BLAST can check this patent out at patentlens and see that the claims are false. If you know anyone with a degree in biology / biochem / chemistry who's familiar with BLAST, just ask them to check. It's nonsense. The patent doesn't have H1N1's genes in it.

  • @openairpreacher YES, it IS a lie. If you goto the patentlens website you can use BLAST to check out the nucleic acid sequences in the patent and compare them to sequences deposited at the NCBI. You can BLAST against "H1N1 subtype" and you will find that NONE of the sequences in this patent are mathces for 2009/H1N1. It's nonsense.

  • Click BLAST and wait for the most similar gene sequences to appear. You will not find 2009/H1N1 listed as a match or having similar gene sequences. For example, sequence 4 in the patent is most similar to Influenza A virus (A/swan/Hokkaido/55/1996(H1N1)­, NA gene and none of the matches listed include 2009(H1N1). You can do the same with the protein sequences and the results will show similarities between protein sequences listed in the patent and all other known protein sequences.

  • The best way to establish that the claim is false is to go to patentlens. Use the "search sequences" link. Click the "By Patent" tab and enter the patent number US20080069821. You'll find 23 DNA/RNA sequences. Under the BLAST column for each SEQ ID No, click NCBI. In the new window, enter "H1N1 subtype" in the "organism" box.  What this does is compare the selected gene sequence from the patent to "H1N1 subtype" gene sequences deposited on the NCBI and displays similarities.

  • The claim made in this video is FALSE. Goto patentlens and use their BLAST tool to check out the DNA/RNA sequences in the patent and search for similarities to 2009/H1N1. NONE of the sequences show similarity to 2009/H1N1.

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more