Darwin's Evolution Religion Falsely Called Science in Public Schools - Part 1 of 3

Dr Michael Girouard of the Institute for Creation Research joins Larry Wessels of Christian Answers (sitting on the steps with the glasses; YouTube channel CANSWERSTV; see websites: BIBLEQUERY.ORG, HISTORYCART.COM & MUSLIMHOPE.COM) on a major university campus to debate and discuss with students the religion of evolution that Charles Darwin popularized with his 1859 book, "On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life". Darwin's general theory says that all living species, from ants to antelopes, broccoli to bats, carrots to cockatoos -- and hummingbirds to humans -- are the result not of imaginative design, but of chance variations. Students are so brainwashed by Darwin's religious beliefs that they fail to see plain scientific evidence to clearly refute it on every side. "Evolution Theory" so-called, is just another religious belief system which has been set you by unbelieving man to escape the knowledge of the true and living God (Romans 1:18-32). To believe in macro Evolution requires more religious FAITH than a simple faith in the God of the Bible Who has provided more than enough EVIDENCE for His existence. Thousands of fulfilled Bible prophecies (over 400 fulfilled messianic prophecies & implications), archaeological verification (Bible contains real cities & places), historical documentation (Bible contains actual people not fictional ones), manuscript evidence (Dead Sea Scrolls, museum document preservation, better evidence than ancients Homer, Plato, Aristotle, Ceasar or whoever), and statistical verification (Bible was written over a space of 1600 years by 40 authors, in three languages, on hundreds of subjects yet it presents one consistent, non-contradictory theme that runs through it all: God's redemption of humankind through His Messiah, Who is Christ Jesus) all provide MORE evidence than Darwin's phony "scientism" religion. To see this video in its full length form go to GOOGLE VIDEO & search LARRY WESSELS on their homepage & look for it.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• scopes
• trial
• redshift
• radiocarbon
• dating
• techniques
• miller
• apparatus
• dna
• molecules
• australopithecus
• archaeopteryx
• entropy
• gill
• slits
• haeckel
• cambrian
• irradiated
• drosophila
• hopeful
• monster
• missing
• links
• fossils
• dinosaurs
• rock

[p90x4lifewaswrong64]

I don't debate Creationists just as a Geographer wouldn't debate a Flat-Earther, but I just wanted to take the time to thank God for the fact that your video only has 580 views and that you have suspended your medical practice. Good luck with your preaching though.

[CAnswersTV]

@p90x4lifewaswrong64 The only "God" you believe in is Charles Darwin & his evolution mythology. Darwin's religion, of which you are a follower, is composed of three elements (a sort of triune "god" of evolutionism) for which you put ALL your trust, namely, FATHER TIME (unlimited billions of years), MOTHER NATURE (only natural processes), & LADY LUCK (chance probabilities). You are deluded & why? "For this cause God shall send them strong delusion that they should believe a lie" (2 Thess 2:11).

[LucianUramu]

No I don't know what "scientism" is since it isn't a real word...

As for who has a metaphysical position, the one that claims things are to complex not to involve magic seems to better fit that title. And as for complexity of the eye itself then I guess your god spent more time concerned about mantis shrimp then humans' visual capacity. "Even a liar can tell you the truth." Are you the liar then? Btw can and willing too are two very different things, so I won't hold my breath for you to say it.

[CAnswersTV]

@LucianUramu Thanks for displaying your ignorance for all to see; according to Wikipedia: "Scientism is the idea that natural science is the most authoritative worldview or aspect of human education, and that it is superior to all other interpretations of life.[1] The term is used by social scientists such as Friedrich Hayek,[2] or philosophers of science such as Karl Popper." Since you're ignorant it proves everything else you say is also ignorant. Your "mantis shrimp" doesn't disprove God.

[anonymousnamealso]

@dogofthegaps I 1never mentioned his birthday. you did. BIble doesn't give a date, just pagan man, much like yourself.

2. There were more than 1eyewitness report. as mentioned in the bible.

[p90x4lifewaswrong64]

@CarnivorousBiped Yeah, Creationists like to quote Darwin's rhetorical technique which was meant to offer something to his naysayers,... only then to disillusion them. It's useful, but Creationists often only quote the rhetorical part, and not what came after.

[CAnswersTV]

@LucianUramu You "fail" on both counts & that's because evolutionary fairytale believers such as yourself can't see the nonsense of their metaphysical position since it is all based on a false sense of security called scientism. Do you even know what "scientism" is? You fail on the "complexity" of the eye since you're not getting the real argument here, the eyes of "wolves, owls, shrimp" or whatever are too complex to have randomly evolved, get it? 2nd "fail": even a liar can tell you the truth.

[LucianUramu]

@CAnswersTV

Fail 1 "perfect & complex" the human eye has less resolution & complexity then most species like wolves, owls, insects. The mantis shrimp in fact can see in both ultraviolet and infrared. I guess its eyes are "perfecter" then ours.

Fail 2 Quoting someone with a Ph.D. in gas kinetics is like taking medical advice from an engineer. Yes they are smart but not in the field they have decided to through their weight in. Your attempt at reasoning is just sad.

[CAnswersTV]

@CarnivorousBiped Quote mining? "Yet reason", what reason? You have something "perfect & complex" with NOTHING to show HOW it got there, get it? How about some more quotes: "I became convinced that people believe in evolution because they choose to do so. It has nothing at all to do with evidence. Evolution is NOT A FACT, as so many bigots maintain. There is not a shread of evidence for the evolution of life on earth." - A.J. Monty White, Ph.D. in gas kinetics, University College of Wales.

[CarnivorousBiped]

@CAnswersTV Quote mining, are we? Should have continued reading:

"Yet reason tells me, that if numerous gradations from a perfect and complex

eye to one very imperfect and simple, each grade being useful to its

possessor, can be shown to exist;..."