Congresswoman Susan Davis Statement on NDAA to Occupy San Diego

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
290 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 19, 2011

Occupy San Diego started out in the morning at the Democratic Party HQ in San Diego. The office was closed for the protest, so the group rallied outside their office for a while against the NDAA and then took the protest to Congresswoman Susan Davis' office. The Congresswoman was in Washington and OSD. She was contacted by her staff and issued an official statement from her office which was delivered to OSD by her San Diego Staffer Daniel. This video is Daniel reading the Congresswoman's statement.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (8)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I believe the part he talks about @ 1:13 must have been changed. From what I gathered this bill directly applies to American citizens.

  • I notice after checking her public finanical statements, Susan Davis has become very well off. I going to check if she has invested back into San Diego such as businesses, projects or bonds.

  • Rand Paul, Senator Sanders, Senator Udall, Senator Feinstein, and 40 signers of a letter to the Military Oversight Committee all believe that this bill contains language that could result in unlimited detentions of US Citizens - the co-author, Senator Levin said the language was not in the original version of the bill, but that the Administration (Obama) asked for it to be included! Susan Davis is incorrect when she says the bill does not contain language allowing for the unlimited detention!

  • Why not go after the Patriot Act? The Patriot Act is the one where Americans can be detained indefinitely without being charged.

  • The legislative and the executive branches have NO BUSINESS making requirements or allowances about what the judiciary branch can or can't do. Any language directing the judiciary what to do is unconstitutional and poses a danger to us all. This bill is an abomination. We need to continue to protest this!

  • From a person whose election was paid for by weapons dealers, I'm sooooo shocked (not really) that she supports this bill. Good job OSD. Democrats are such liars at least the republicans are open about wanting to rip all your rights away in the name of freedom.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more