@asunsetinmyveins Soldiers and intelligence agents undergo extreme physical training to prepare them for it in case it were to happen to them one day. This way they can learn to deal with it without giving up information. That's why we put them through it. And the difference is... the soldiers SIGN UP FOR IT. Anyways, I don't care if we even torture people, but only if we have evidence that proves them guilty of a crime. We should have strong evidence before we take such rash action.
How does water boarding not torture someone mentally? I think you have the "inability to reason clearly" Hannity. I mean, seriously? You are looking to Gohmert for logic and reason? The guy couldn't pass a high school logic test... not to mention his inability to fully research a subject before making up his mind on an issue.
I would love to water board Hannity. I wouldn't damage him but I would enjoy making him suffer badly. Before Bush the US newspapers had always referred to water boarding as torture but as soon as Americans administered it they changed the terminology to 'interrogation'. This is Orwell speak. The perpetrators of torture never admit to doing anything wrong, just look at the trial of the murderous Khmer Rouge leaders all of whom deny committing crime.
I wonder what the AG actually says? Weird they only play the part where he says " The Legal Sense, it's a fundamentally different thing." And that is it. The rest isn't the AG. And, actually, It makes sense for he attorney general to begin with that.
Hannity is utterly dishonest and manipulating at the very least. It is pretty much lying to do what Hannity does there. Right? Or is that just me not understanding? Sold by republicrats anyway. It's the media itself that is the bad guys.
By that reasoning it would be Ok to eletrecute the balls of suspect, if you did the same on Marines - so each time a prisoner gets tortured the same act has to be performed to a soldier - does this make any sense
If US soldiers undergo waterboarding as part of training (I'm unclear on that, but that's how I understand it), and it is, by definition, torture, then why are we putting our own soldiers through that? I say if we continue to let our own soldiers undergo this practice, then it's okay to do it to get information from someone, but not to harm.
Whats the deal islam uses beheading as daneal pearl .
mcpat1000 3 months ago
@asunsetinmyveins Soldiers and intelligence agents undergo extreme physical training to prepare them for it in case it were to happen to them one day. This way they can learn to deal with it without giving up information. That's why we put them through it. And the difference is... the soldiers SIGN UP FOR IT. Anyways, I don't care if we even torture people, but only if we have evidence that proves them guilty of a crime. We should have strong evidence before we take such rash action.
schmotzegesicht 1 year ago
How does water boarding not torture someone mentally? I think you have the "inability to reason clearly" Hannity. I mean, seriously? You are looking to Gohmert for logic and reason? The guy couldn't pass a high school logic test... not to mention his inability to fully research a subject before making up his mind on an issue.
schmotzegesicht 1 year ago
I would love to water board Hannity. I wouldn't damage him but I would enjoy making him suffer badly. Before Bush the US newspapers had always referred to water boarding as torture but as soon as Americans administered it they changed the terminology to 'interrogation'. This is Orwell speak. The perpetrators of torture never admit to doing anything wrong, just look at the trial of the murderous Khmer Rouge leaders all of whom deny committing crime.
spartan8oo 1 year ago
I wonder what the AG actually says? Weird they only play the part where he says " The Legal Sense, it's a fundamentally different thing." And that is it. The rest isn't the AG. And, actually, It makes sense for he attorney general to begin with that.
Hannity is utterly dishonest and manipulating at the very least. It is pretty much lying to do what Hannity does there. Right? Or is that just me not understanding? Sold by republicrats anyway. It's the media itself that is the bad guys.
BWEisTaken 1 year ago
Holder another obama rubber stamp
bluedemon245 1 year ago
By that reasoning it would be Ok to eletrecute the balls of suspect, if you did the same on Marines - so each time a prisoner gets tortured the same act has to be performed to a soldier - does this make any sense
wildhias 1 year ago
Hannity had the chance to be waterboarded. A dare from Keith Oberman! What happened (Chicken???)
Gutless wonder!
toeman888 1 year ago 2
If US soldiers undergo waterboarding as part of training (I'm unclear on that, but that's how I understand it), and it is, by definition, torture, then why are we putting our own soldiers through that? I say if we continue to let our own soldiers undergo this practice, then it's okay to do it to get information from someone, but not to harm.
asunsetinmyveins 2 years ago
So, if Watebording is so wonderful for Sean Hannity and those two Nuts.
Why do not we waterbord these three.
I would volunteer to give them 30 or 40 minute straight of pure Joy of some fantastic Waterboding.
JerezJulio 2 years ago