kpro rsx type-s vs rsx type-s vs srt4
Top Comments
All Comments (330)
-
@dc4integrajdm yeah but look closely how the srt4 was creeping up and the rsx let off.. yeah u right, it was hardly a race.
-
@killakdc5 yeah stock ones.. race real ones.. dont hate on neons, cuz really they have alot of potential when done right. honda cant beat a neon from stock vs stock, u have to mod a honda just to beat a neon, just remember that.. i have a rsx type s, srt4, and 95 fully built gsr coupe..
-
@killakdc5 yea it's cool if you prefer the type s. there's nothing wrong with it i just prefer the srt4. i just can't stand all the ignorant haters thats all.
-
@TurboNeon185 i owned both of those cars, and while it certainly is cheaper to buy a srt-4, the rsx looks better, and my rsx was boosted and destroyed every srt4 i ever raced.
-
riceer
-
@jeredh no shit thats why i was saying itd be cool to combine all three. and for your information SH preludes dont have lsd and only a handful of hondas have LSD and theyre mostly not usdm.
-
@gruneygunnar Honda already has all of those. RWD=S2K, Turbo=RDX, LSD=Si, SH (lots of Honda's have LSDs. And just putting it out there to all who think Si's are fast, THEY ARE NOT FAST!!! AT ALL! All they have going for them is a 6spd w/LSD.
-
Wow that was a slow ass turtle race. Get some real cars please.
-
Lol the srt4 was in 4th and the type s in 3rd. Hardly even a race.
@twenty10si yea i eff'd up there. thats what happens when you make drunk comments. what i meant was that a full bolt on srt4 running the stock turbo can be faster than most turbo k20s. and my point is that modding an srt4 into the 12s is much cheaper and easier than putting a turbo on an si or type s. and on top of that the srt4 costed less to buy in the first place.
TurboNeon185 5 months ago 3
Any Boosted k20 will slaughter most cars from a roll. Adding boost to a k20 is like turning super saiyan, the power to weight ratio is ridiculous.
betterdropdatdonk 1 day ago 2