Tongues are not demonic!

John MacArthur is in serious error concerning Tongues. As far as the persons who have had the Baptism in the Holy Spirit and received the evidence of speaking in tongues are concerned they need to take courage in situations where such errors are sent like arrows from the Pharisee bow. Jesus when casting out devils was accused of being the chief devil. Then He taught about those who blasphemed against the Holy Spirit. Those Pharisees were aware of the Holy Spirit and the power of God upon Christ and yet they said He had a devil. They were charging that His inspiration whom we know to be the Holy Spirit that it was a devil. That is the blasphemy of the Holy Spirit. Jesus continued to teachMar 3:28 Verily I say unto you, All sins shall be forgiven unto the sons of men, and blasphemies wherewith soever they shall blaspheme:
Mar 3:29 But he that shall blaspheme against the Holy Ghost hath never forgiveness, but is in danger of eternal damnation:
Mar 3:30 Because they said, He hath an unclean spirit.
The poisonous darts of the Pharisees will not cause those of the Spirit to waver.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• John MacArthur is In Error
• Blasphemy of the Holy Spirit
• Tongues from The Holy Spirit
• Speaking in tongues
• Glossalalia
• Power from On High
• Gift of the Holy Spirit

[Gate2enter4life47]

Dolce If someone is an unbeliever anything is possible with them. But Jesus said if your a Child and you ask Him for the Holy Spirit then that's what you will get. Luk 11:13 If ye then, being evil, know how to give good gifts unto your children: how much more shall your heavenly Father give the Holy Spirit to them that ask him?

God doesn't give demons to His children Dolce. Notice the gift is given to believers. Meaning it is a separate experience to the rebirth.

[Gate2enter4life47]

Mar 3:22 And the scribes which came down from Jerusalem said, He hath Beelzebub, and by the prince of the devils casteth he out devils.

Mar 3:23 And he called them unto him, and said unto them in parables, How can Satan cast out Satan? Mar 3:29 But he that shall blaspheme against the Holy Ghost hath never forgiveness, but is in danger of eternal damnation:

Mar 3:30 Because they said, He hath an unclean spirit.

How obvious to the enlightened, but how blind are the willfully ignorant!

[Gate2enter4life47]

Mat_15:14 Let them alone: they be blind leaders of the blind. And if the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch.The doctrine of Calvinism concludes that the blasphemy of the Holy Spirit is not believing in Christ. They add this to the foolishness of the doctrine eternal security.If their false assumption were true they can then believe it is impossible to blaspheme the Holy Spirit.A false notion again. Jesus clarified what it was in Mark's Gospel.

[Gate2enter4life47]

That friend is the blasphemy of the Holy Spirit.You have called them idiots but if you accuse the inspiration of the Holy Spirit of being a demon, that is the blasphemy of the Holy Spirit.I warn all who presume to accuse this gift being the Inspiration of the devil I shudder at the final outcome.The Pharisee spirit is alive and well with the duplicate accusations against the body of Christ.

[Gate2enter4life47]

2Pe_3:16 As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction. It's not strange however that your ignorance of truth fit's the same category as spoken of by the Lord Jesus Himself!When the Holy Spirit's power is operating They accused Jesus of having a devil. They knew it was the Holy Spirit but they said its a devil.

[Gate2enter4life47]

Tongues...To sing with the understanding and sing in tongues.  Common spiritual sense makes it very clear. But of course it does not fit your doctrine and you go on to make up a doctrine that can be shredded from the scriptures.So again you tell us that this is pagan Gibberish but as usual no valid doctrinal proof. You forced that into the text. You are following the ones that Peter spoke of

[Gate2enter4life47]

Won't you see it.Who are you trying to fool?Paul makes it so clear but it is not in your doctrine so you try to invent a meaning.Your premise is"It can't mean that so we will make it mean something Else.So now you think it can't mean God so you do what the JWs did to John 1.You are supposing it is not a prayer to God so you do the JW cop out. Then you would have to say that this builds up the spiritual life of the individual. How absurd. So Paul teaches us to pray in the understanding and in_

[Gate2enter4life47]

By the Holy Spirit. 1Co 14:15 What is it then? I will pray with the spirit, and I will pray with the understanding also: I will sing with the spirit, and I will sing with the understanding also. Here Paul again refers to himself praying and singing in tongues he did not understand. Praying in the spirit is clearly explained as praying in tongues. And praying in the understanding is obvious.Can't you see the distinction between a language of the understanding and tongues.Or is it you won't...

[Gate2enter4life47]

He says he did. Talking in the Church he would rather use his understanding rather than a tongue. Pleas tell me oh scholar what else could he mean. Where would he be speaking the tongues if not in the Church? Why would he not speak the tongues if they were understood languages? What do you think praying in Tongues means?Well here is the meaning, 1Co 14:14 For if I pray in an unknown tongue, my spirit prayeth, but my understanding is unfruitful. The spirit of the person prays empowered...

[Gate2enter4life47]

How interesting that you assume that Paul never spoke in an unknown tongue. Strange but not in the Bible. Agin it is bypassing 1Cor.14:18-19, where Paul clearly distinguishes between a languge of understanding spoken in the Church and a language not understood by him referring to speaking in tongues more than them all. But again your trying to put a square peg in a round hole to force the error. What do you think he meant in those verses that you are misinterpreting. You said he didn't ....