Esther Duflo: Social experiments to fight poverty
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Uploaded on May 4, 2010
http://www.ted.com Alleviating poverty is more guesswork than science, and lack of data on aid's impact raises questions about how to provide it. But Clark Medal-winner Esther Duflo says it's possible to know which development efforts help and which hurt -- by testing solutions with randomized trials.
TEDTalks is a daily video podcast of the best talks and performances from the TED Conference, where the world's leading thinkers and doers give the talk of their lives in 18 minutes. Featured speakers have included Al Gore on climate change, Philippe Starck on design, Jill Bolte Taylor on observing her own stroke, Nicholas Negroponte on One Laptop per Child, Jane Goodall on chimpanzees, Bill Gates on malaria and mosquitoes, Pattie Maes on the "Sixth Sense" wearable tech, and "Lost" producer JJ Abrams on the allure of mystery. TED stands for Technology, Entertainment, Design, and TEDTalks cover these topics as well as science, business, development and the arts. Closed captions and translated subtitles in a variety of languages are now available on TED.com, at http://www.ted.com/translate. Watch a highlight reel of the Top 10 TEDTalks at http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/top10
-
Category
-
License
Standard YouTube License
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
-
26:41
Abhijit Banerjee & Esther Duflo at THiNK 2011by tehelkatvFeatured
3,346
-
18:35
Simon Sinek: How great leaders inspire actionby TEDtalksDirector
1,773,134 views
-
20:29
Stephen Wolfram: Computing a theory of everythingby TEDtalksDirector
209,915 views
-
18:24
Dan Ariely: Why we think it's OK to cheat and steal (sometimes)by TEDtalksDirector
297,701 views
-
19:06
George Whitesides: Toward a science of simplicityby TEDtalksDirector
33,205 views
-
145
videos
Play all
Ted Talksby pakratmak
-
18:58
Seth Godin: How to get your ideas to spreadby TEDtalksDirector
509,955 views
-
15:29
Sheryl Sandberg: Why we have too few women leadersby TEDtalksDirector
493,011 views
-
19:02
Michael Specter: The danger of science denialby TEDtalksDirector
223,287 views
-
18:46
Oliver Sacks: What hallucination reveals about our mindsby TEDtalksDirector
156,492 views
-
12:04
Esther Duflo, Pourquoi y-a-t-il encore un milliard de pauvres ? Part.2by docmabuse007
2,242 views
-
19:05
Susan Cain: The power of introvertsby TEDtalksDirector
1,386,822 views
-
34:06
Evelyn Glennie: How to truly listenby TEDTalks
685,599 views
-
17:34
Denis Dutton: A Darwinian theory of beautyby TEDtalksDirector
349,778 views
-
12:02
Esther Duflo, Pourquoi y-a-t-il encore un milliard de pauvres ? Part.1by docmabuse007
5,545 views
-
19:11
Kavita Ramdas: Radical women, embracing traditionby TEDtalksDirector
32,733 views
-
22:12
Dan Buettner: How to live to be 100+by TEDtalksDirector
275,412 views
-
17:27
Dan Ariely asks, Are we in control of our decisions?by TEDtalksDirector
402,817 views
-
18:45
Nicholas Christakis: The hidden influence of social networksby TEDtalksDirector
94,940 views
-
6:30
Lies, damned lies and statistics (about TEDTalks)by TEDtalksDirector
154,485 views
-
22:15
Michael Sandel: The lost art of democratic debateby TEDtalksDirector
106,652 views
- Loading more suggestions...
Top Comments
Fahab747 4 months ago
Brilliant ! A true scientific approach to a question plagued with judgmental ideologies.
The US gvt made a great decision in integrating her !
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
enoonsti 9 months ago
*blink* You have to be kidding me. Did you really spend 17 minutes on this video and not get anything out of it? She did not advocate a silver bullet because... well, there is no silver bullet. You have to do many small things. The key point is to use randomized trials to help determine which small steps are actually effective.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
All Comments (147)
abdamit 2 months ago
is she french ?
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Cappa Somatic 8 months ago
You should read justinewhitfield's comment-- 2 below.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
10ccalanarkush 11 months ago
nope the paltry, technocratic bandaids proferred to gargantuan cancerous structural issues that cause poverty were enough to "inpire" me to click dislike. people aren't necessarily that shallow
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Justine W 1 year ago
I feel like the idea that the gov'ts would be involved is intrinsic. Who else would implement these programs? IGOs and NGOs.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Justine W 1 year ago
its a theory of political development. This is about reducing risk to shock. If you reduce a person's risk to various shocks (i.e. I have to pay a ton of money for hospital bills etc.) then their income can be distributed elsewhere. Full human development on all levels will increase prosperity economically. The argument to this particular approach to development is like "can lead a horse to water but cant make it drink". Communities involvement leads to more efficient develop't programs.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
mmaylad 1 year ago
inspiring a lot!
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube