DARFUR: Sudan Ambassador Denies Genocide

Video of an Embassy of Sudan press conference May 30, 2007 at the National Press Club in DC

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• darfur
• sudan

[mikebostonjones]

Sudanese rebels demanded Beijing to pull it out of Darfur just hours after after a unit of Chinese engineers flew into the Sudanese region-Reuters, Khartoum November 24/2007

China sent 130 soldiers but it was rejected by the rebels. China's state owned China National Petroleum Corp. has invested at least $ 5 billion with Sudanese goverment, China is also Sudan's largest arms supplier, and recent U.N investigation told the source of most weapons used in genocide were Chinese made weapons.

[BoriChumba]

amustad 'admits' ... my mind is under someone's elses mind-control.

[ArmenOfTheNorth]

slave trading, murdering, thieving, lying, raping, opium dealing, genociding=arab

[ajasoft]

Israel killing Palestinians everyday using USA guns and no one care, now they care about Darfur !!. the reason why is that Darfur has a huge resources or OIL and USA would like to cut it off from Sudan to get that OIL .

[e75149938]

@abonoora You don't think strange that the Sudan government required economic pressure to stop this genocide? That the rebels didn't need any pressure to get to a peace agreement? He contradicts himself in his own speach and you see nothing...

[e75149938]

@askyourdoctor1 Yeah and you never see them blaming any terrorist factions killing innocents in the name of Islam. I'm sure that if those jihadists did hijack their "Islam of peace" they would complain, but they don't... So, those terrorists are not hijacking Islam, but applying Islam with lies, conquests, riots, looting raping. Exactly as can be seen by all those radical/fundamental Islamists over the world and in history with their "prophet".

[e75149938]

@ne0aes0pDltdNOTDftd At least with sanctions did the Sudanese government stop it's proxy war with the janjaweed. Why was it needed to have sanctions to have Sudan stop waging war against the "rebels"?

[e75149938]

@ne0aes0pDltdNOTDftd As if there were not enough evidence of the genocide. You come up with the same statements as Turcs who deny they are responsible of the genocide of Armenians. Israel has nothing to do with Darfur or Sudan, stop putting all mYseries of the world on their backs. Why did the Sudanese government have to be forced to peace with economic pressure and the rebels agree for peace without any pressure? Who is the one attacking and who is defending, you always do twist reality...

[e75149938]

@bbsd0011 Maybe you miss that the rebels are defending themselves from the double standard put in place by the sudanese govt between the non-arab muslims and the arab muslims and the Sudanese regime's oppression. Why is it with pressure on Sudan govt that they got peace? The guy himself states that the rebels have no pressure, yet they accepted peace, so who is attacking??? The ones that seek peace for nothing (Rebels) or the ones forced to peace (Sudan government). stop lying man....

[e75149938]

@BoriChumba I think both you and bbsd0011 are wrong. You are not able to have your own opinions, you appropriate the expression of others... It's clear that the Sudan regime is performing ethnic cleansing in Darfour, not to mention the one in South Lebanon which was Muslims against Christians. It is known that the Sudanese regime is making a proxy war through founds to the janjaweed. Think a little, if the rebels were the ones not wanting peace, then why is it with pressure on sudan we got peace