Icons of Evolution Part 1 of 6 by Heinz Lycklama
Uploader Comments (mayartay)
All Comments (17)
-
The more I understand evolution, the less I believe it !
-
Perhaps you should do a little bit of research yourself before blindly following what people tell you.
-
The simple fact that this books was carefully studied and rejected by the scientific community should speak for itself.
Furthermore, Mr. Jonathan Wells is know for his misrepresentation of information, quote mining to assume credibility (even though that removes credibility, considering that is all he's doing without conducting any sort of research that was peer reviewed in anyway), and often bordlerlines on outright slander.
-
@mayartay Watch "Judgement Day:Intelligent Design on Trial". The Discovery Institutes (PHD) Michael Behe presents that groups ideas in court. Unfortunately, for the Discovery Institute, there were actual scientists in the room. The 2005 court case was Kitzmiller vs Dover Schools.
-
@mayartay millions of brilliant scientists, philosophers since Aristotle and before, the US supreme court and the disciplines of Astronomy, Geology, Biology, Paleontology, Archeology, Physics, Chemistry backed up by institutions such as Harvard, Princeton, MIT, Cambridge, Oxford, Imperial College. What have you got Southern Baptist college, Discovery Institute, crooks like Kent Hovind with his diploma mill qualifications and all the evangelical liars and nuts conning the frightened masses.
-
Wow, you mean evolution doesn't answer where water came from? Could that be because it's a theory that explains the diversity of life and not the existence of everything?
"Discovery Institute" a truly repugnant, disingenuous (word was invented for this organisation), cynical, dishonest group of charlatans who serve no conceivable purpose other than push the political agenda of their shady benefactors. If there ever was a more dark, conspiritorial and dangerous group it is this unpleasant manifestation of superstitious nuts. Third rate academics and scientists prostituting their inferior credentials for mammon.
vohshkab 1 year ago
@vohshkab Can you back up your charges with evidence? Why should anyone care about your opinions and lies? The scholars who work for DI do have credentials so that makes you guilty of lying and slander.
mayartay 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Evidence of design does not necessarily imply the existence of a supernatural designer.
Not all atheists accept Darwin's theory of evolution.
ares213 4 years ago
That's more respectable than supposing that the fossil record, to take one example, proves Darwinism.
I don't agree with the a priori view that excludes anything "supernatural." I think scientism is as unproven as any other metaphysical assumption. I believe the Universe includes intelligence, mind, and spirit as unique realities, not mere manifestations emanating from matter.
mayartay 4 years ago