Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

RE: Random Questions Atheists Will look Stupid Trying To Answer (part 2)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
510 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 26, 2011

I continue to berate Manuppowerup for his ignorance of science.

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (BlueSpirals)

  • oke, question.. the big bang was an explosion of matter in a space where there first was nothing. so if there first was nothing where did the matter come from?

    i'm not saying that you're wrong or right i'm just curious.

  • @Harlekijn1982 The big bang was not an explosion of nothing. As I stated in the video, all the matter in the universe was simply condensed into one point. Kind of like, imagine having a marble. Except that marble ways about 10^100000000000000000 pounds. Then you shatter the marble and end up with a trillion trillion trillion pieces.

  • First of all, I love your vids... BUT, to your point at the beginning, that the big bang is proven.... Well... It's not.... Background radiation at the levels we found in the universe were predicted way before we came up with the big bang, and according to the Big bang theory way more background radiation should be there... But since there isn't scientist simply adapted their values, and try to find an explanation... And there are examples where the redshift indicates the opposite...

  • @kick2004 Sorry, redshift indicating what exactly?

  • @BlueSpirals Indicating that the universe is not expanding, therefore the big bang theory isn't correct... I'm not saying it's false, I'm just saying that we still have to figure some things out, before we say it's proven ;) Thats why we say "The big bang THEORY"... But thats how science works, and it's also a good thing, that science doesn't claim to know everything ;)

  • @kick2004 Okay, now that you have completely misused the word 'theory', I feel like I should disregard what you are saying. A scientific Theory is an expression of a relationship between observation and scientific laws. Theory does NOT mean speculation. And I feel like you dont know much about the big bang if you are saying that it has not yet been demonstrated. Redshift demonstrates that objects are moving away from us, not toward.

see all

All Comments (59)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • REALLY FUCKIN FAST!

  • @distillednikki Dude, for the last time... I do NOT deny that the big bang happened -.- I just say that it is not yet (completely) proven...

  • @kick2004

    No you are wrong, the big bang DID happen and the only cosmologists, astronomers or physicists that deny this fact are not worthy of their titles.

  • Nevertheless, it's the best we've come up with so far... But it still has to be proven ;) The rest of the vid: PERFECT! Keep up the good work ;)

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more