IF it's good for "The Gipper," it's good for the gander and it must be true, correct?
From the Human Events webpage:
"If Iran's nuclear facilities are ever destroyed, it will likely be by Israel, not the U.S. The Israelis, reports HUMAN EVENTS, are ready with a plan to take out sites manned by scientists, engineers and military officers who are developing the next round of Holocaust weapons."
It will then examine how this structure limits the government's ability to regulate hate speech on the Internet. This section will also explore other legal means that are being used to regulate hate speech. Finally, it will conclude by taking a look at alternative techniques that are being used to protect individuals from hate speech. Examining the Problem: The Need for Additional Regulation of Hateful Cyberspeech
Secondly, hate-filled speech may go beyond simply altering an individual's thoughts and may in fact lead to crimes of death and destruction arising from the exposure to such ideas. This Comment will attempt to illustrate the need for increased regulation of hate speech on the Internet by examining three facets of this debate. It will first examine existing First Amendment precedent dealing with freedom of expression issues generally.
The danger of free speech in cyberspace crossing over to become language that perpetuates hatred and provokes violence is a very real threat. This threat manifests itself in two primary forms. First, young Internet users who may be easily influenced are exposed to hate-filled ideals and values, often without any regulation or guidance.
I urge everyone seeing someone posting hate speech to Google department of homeland security and list who stated the hate speech along with which video it was posted. There is an anti-american boiler room operation which can been seen if you researched enough of the Reagan posting pages. Free speech is protected, hate speech is a crime that needs to be reported.
As the national security of the United States has become increasingly important in recent months, the debate regarding the censorship of hate speech has again arisen. While many individuals remain wary of infringing upon First Amendment rights through the regulation of hate speech in cyberspace, some suggest that the expansive and pervasive nature of the Internet calls for such regulation.
America will not recover until the Reagan brand of "CREDIT CARD conservatism" is relegated to the ash heap of history.
RonPaulGeorgeRingo 3 years ago
IF it's good for "The Gipper," it's good for the gander and it must be true, correct?
From the Human Events webpage:
"If Iran's nuclear facilities are ever destroyed, it will likely be by Israel, not the U.S. The Israelis, reports HUMAN EVENTS, are ready with a plan to take out sites manned by scientists, engineers and military officers who are developing the next round of Holocaust weapons."
ikekll 3 years ago
"Saudi Arabia's oil minister called the price spikes unjustified and attributed them to SPECULATION"
******
"In 1975, about 80 percent of foreign exchange transactions were to conduct business in the real economy.
The remaining 20% of transactions in 1975 were SPECULATIVE
(speculation loosely defined = expected profit from buying and selling currencies themselves, based on their changing values)
Today the REAL economy...transactions is down to 2.5%! "97.5% IS NOW SPECULATIVE."
ikekll 3 years ago
"Is there anybody out there?"
who can answer this question with confidence that it's accurate and agenda-free?
WHO is the most influential individual "investor/speculator" profiting from the commodities/futures, specifically oil?
ikekll 3 years ago
Testing, testing-
"in search of signs for intelligent life on planet earth."
ikekll 3 years ago
It will then examine how this structure limits the government's ability to regulate hate speech on the Internet. This section will also explore other legal means that are being used to regulate hate speech. Finally, it will conclude by taking a look at alternative techniques that are being used to protect individuals from hate speech. Examining the Problem: The Need for Additional Regulation of Hateful Cyberspeech
phoenixhammeroftruth 4 years ago
Secondly, hate-filled speech may go beyond simply altering an individual's thoughts and may in fact lead to crimes of death and destruction arising from the exposure to such ideas. This Comment will attempt to illustrate the need for increased regulation of hate speech on the Internet by examining three facets of this debate. It will first examine existing First Amendment precedent dealing with freedom of expression issues generally.
phoenixhammeroftruth 4 years ago
The danger of free speech in cyberspace crossing over to become language that perpetuates hatred and provokes violence is a very real threat. This threat manifests itself in two primary forms. First, young Internet users who may be easily influenced are exposed to hate-filled ideals and values, often without any regulation or guidance.
phoenixhammeroftruth 4 years ago
I urge everyone seeing someone posting hate speech to Google department of homeland security and list who stated the hate speech along with which video it was posted. There is an anti-american boiler room operation which can been seen if you researched enough of the Reagan posting pages. Free speech is protected, hate speech is a crime that needs to be reported.
phoenixhammeroftruth 4 years ago
As the national security of the United States has become increasingly important in recent months, the debate regarding the censorship of hate speech has again arisen. While many individuals remain wary of infringing upon First Amendment rights through the regulation of hate speech in cyberspace, some suggest that the expansive and pervasive nature of the Internet calls for such regulation.
phoenixhammeroftruth 4 years ago