Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Peter Lik Photographer--WlRN TV CH 17 ARTSTREET

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
25,742
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 9, 2008

Peter Lik Photographer--WlRN TV CH 17 ARTSTREET

Category:

Film & Animation

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 4 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (25)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • a scanned film has more detail than the digital equivalent. that is why he is always using his Linhof.

  • I wonder if he is even the one who processes his shots...

    

  • Who give a flying f@#k if the images are processed,HDR,too much saturation,cliche....the masses love his work,they pay through the roof to have his images and he makes more than anyone of us here doing what he loves!!

  • If his prints really reflect the scene he sees, the man must have mutant retinas with twice the cones of normal people. Most folks look at his stuff and immediately think "BFD, he just cranked the saturation to 11." Even the 'old' high saturation slide films cannot begin to produce the sort of Crayola colors this guy likes.

  • @Jawsjawsjawsrg Looks like is an Alpa body. Gear like that is crazy expensive which, as you can probably tell, doesn't really stop Peter Lik (his printer setup is over $1M). For the little guy wanting to shoot panos though, consider investing in tilt-shift lens or, if you want to shoot film, a more affordable pano camera. Perhaps something like Fuji or fotoman's 617. Or Linhof's 617 but that'll run you close to $10k.

  • What is the first panoramic camera that he has in there? The one that he attach the medium format digital back to. And how does he set that up? I would really like to do nature photography like he does it. So if there are any suggestions on other set ups that I can afford, I am all ears.

  • This is very interesting. If you ask anyone working in a Lik gallery, they will tell you that he uses no Photoshop at all. At least here he clarifies things.

  • @DylanFoxPhotography Yeah, but take a look at Mangelsen's work. Close up if you can. It has much less of the processed look. We ALL process our photos, but you and I know that the trick is to make it look how people want to see it without making it look overly processed.

  • @zavatone photographs have always been heavily processed. Do some reading into Ansel Adams skills in the dark room!

  • @zavatone yes, but someone like yourself with a limited eye that only sees the surface of a work of art can not see the true spirit of what the artist is portraying, his process has true meaning, sorry you can't see that.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more