Dawkins Confused Does and Doesn't Know Truth

The enigmatic apostle of atheism and evolution says he has the truth but then again admits that no one knows the truth about evolution.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• evolution
• Dawkins
• Richard
• atheism
• confused
• Delusion

[revjimbob]

This is incoherent shite.

[onycho1]

Look rimjob

Just because you don't understand Prof Dawkins and his equating thought, consciousness and awarenewss with materialism is evidence of your intelligence pay grade.

Get a life...

[warshingtondude]

If you have seen some interviews done with Richard Dawkins and know his idealogy then this is TOTALLY HILARIOUS! Finally a satirical twist on the stiff discussions that usually surround this dude.

[revjimbob]

"pay grade"

Get yourself a new insult.

[onycho1]

Yes verifiable materialism is no more than hypothesizing your thoughts are being stolen by moon-men.

Richard Dawkins' existence nor stabbing yourself in the heart with a sharp knife doesn't provee anything about reality.

The nature of our very solid existence or matter being anything at all is now questioned by scientists who have empirical evidence that they just don't know.

[onycho1]

You may not like to buy into anything but the fact remains that science has conducted the split screen experiment over and over and over again. The results appear to be reproducible each time which may not agree with your buying into anything.

Classical physics has come to an abrupt change with the advent of newer evidence.

[onycho1]

What are you trying to say? The Quantum theories seem to find evidence that nothing really exists except for thought and freewill.

For according to Einstein's General Relativity states that matter is actually condensed energy but science has no idea of what energy might be.

Its all from the mind's eye point of reference.

[onycho1]

What are you thinking or trying to establish? What is a thinking mechanism or what acquires information about itself? Your talking gibberish.

Who are you to THINK that the physics of Quantum Mechanics need to turn its attention to anything? Classical science and its facts, theories and observations are in the realm of faith and religious belief that one's senses are giving an accurate representation of anything.

Science is based on philosophy for nothing it finds is absolute.

[onycho1]

Okay I'm open for your demonstration that materialism has thought. Any valid source would be appreciated.

Again I'm open to any proof that 'thinking' is clearly measurable in the brain. Increased electrical or neuronal activity on a monitor proves nothing except that SOMETHING is happening but thinking cannot be equated with electrical or particle mass (material) having anything we know as awareness, thought, thinking or ciphering.

Got any real evidence that we can see?

[drdirs]

As for wave-particle duality etc., I don't buy into what I like to think of as the misrepresentation that mere perception of an experiment really influences its outcome. Measurement, however, and the exchange of energy that any type of measurement requires, WILL have an effect, especially when this energy is NOT negligible compared to the scale of what's being studied (as it would be in classical physics).