Moonfaker: Exhibit A. PART 1

http://www.moonmovie.com
http://www.billkaysing.com
http://www.ralphrene.com
http://www.moonhoax.us

The first installment of a new series by Jarrah White about the Apollo Moon Landings originally released on January 7th 2007.

Watch as The Grandson of The Apollo Hoax Theory challenges the authenticity of photograph AS17-136-20744.

Could the unparallel shadows have been caused by perspective as the pro-NASA group suggest?

Jarrah White would like to invite you to see the Apollo 11 footage that Svector, Phantom Wolf and Shane Killian have tried to suppress from public view.

APOLLO XI: THE LITTLE GEM
http://moonhoax.us/littlegem.htm

See also the evidence of faked and suppressed Apollo 10 footage that Mark Gray doesn't want you to see.

FLAGGING THE GEMS
http://moonhoax.us/flagginggems.htm

Category:

Howto & Style

Tags:

• Jarrah
• White
• Apollo
• moon
• hoax

[unicornjustice]

during night on Earth the sun reflects light off the moon giving enough light to see by. its possible that the Earth reflected some of the sun's light causing the nonparallel shadows. also the moon landing was in 1969 its been 40 years, we have mars probes, communications satellites, an international space station and missiles that can blow up the F*&@ing moon. just accept that you are wrong and stop trying to ruin all those people's hard work

[WhiteJarrah]

"during night on Earth the sun reflects light off the moon giving enough light to see by. its possible that the Earth reflected some of the sun's light causing the nonparallel shadows."

That's discussed in Part 2. The earth dose cast shadows, but Phil Plait claims that they are too faint to be seen against the lunar surface.

[Lo2dShaitan]

we can ping the moon with the lunar laser ranging retroreflector array. DUMBASS

[WhiteJarrah]

"we can ping the moon with the lunar laser ranging retroreflector array. DUMBASS"

Debunked here: watch ? v = 1rvmBEsTcoU

And here: watch ? v = zCD4lY13D1E

[lyniseuk]

2 light sources create 2 shadows just go to a floodlight football match and you will see multiple shadows, guys again more bad science get a life and stop interpritating NASA data to form a theory to furhter your cause!!! If NASA faked everything they would not release soo much data to the public, also why haven't the Russians said that NASA faked all the missions...think about it?

[WhiteJarrah]

"2 light sources create 2 shadows"

Discussed in this very video.

"why haven't the Russians said that NASA faked all the missions"

See here: watch ? v = nZN3PI7HRvU

[jpommers87]

That day is today however. Satellites have recently taken pictures of the landings sites while orbiting the moon. Guess what? All the landing gear and equipment is still there!

Conspiracy theorists = fail.

[tenthousandyearsgoon]

keep up the good work brother. anyone with more than 2 brain cells going in the same direction knows that Apollo wasa the biggest friggin hoax of the last century.

[yesiamawizardjonny]

What is the song you use in the opening of MoonFaker?

[tjmac7]

wouldnt put it past the US government to touch up and fake a few photographs from such a major mission and that seems to be the problem, they just cant help embellishing the truth and looking like liars.

[tehPete]

@jpommers87 Any chance you could link me to a page clearly showing them? I've been looking for those photos forever, you'd think that they'd be almost as famous as those taken on the moon itself given all the disbelievers!

[MaikUniversum]

@jpommers87 and no one bother to reply to your comment because author is too afraid to admit he is a nut.

[spangalat]

@WhiteJarrah Shadows produced by a single light source will always be parallel. However, they will only appear parallel in a photograph if that photograph is taken from a view point on a plane perpendicular to the line of the shadows. In the moon scenario that would have to be an overhead shot looking down on the moon. Any photographs taken off this plane (as all Apollo pictures had to be) will show the shadows converging, usually towards the horizon. Its simple ray path analysis.

[Cougar139tweak]

@forestinfullbloom You're correct but that comment is for those who say the reflectors are some kind of "proof" that we got there, irregardless that you would or wouldn't need them to get the laser to bounce back. Perfect photos are proof enough for me that somethings up, just look a photos made by the Soviets on the Luna missions as well as current (1995) problems with radiation on film.

[forestinfullbloom]

@Cougar139tweak You don't need reflectors to get laser to bounce back from the moon. It can be done without the reflectors. Both the US and the USSR have done laser ranging before the alleged moon "landing".

[Cougar139tweak]

@Lo2dShaitan Yes so can Russia with the two reflectors they left on the moon- oh wait,.. they didn't send men to the moon did they??.....hmmmm wonder how those got there- Luna 17

[Cougar139tweak]

@unicornjustice International Space Station-Apogee 360 km (194 nmi) (farthest out) ; Moon-Perigee 363,104 km (closest) Mars probes-Unmanned Communication satellites-Unmanned no "missles" Even saturn V was a staged rocket. And whats with your tag? Unicornjustice?! honestly I really shouldn't bother, Probes made it to the moon that's for sure and man has made it into space- It's the man on the moon part that's in question....Google radioactive moon and click on the NASA website link...