9/11: Controlled Demolition Comparison
Loading...
Uploaded by rockydelforge on May 5, 2009
Compares the destruction of the World Trade Center buildings (North and South Towers and Building 7) with controlled demolitions. Uses voice-overs of Peter Jennings and Richard Gage of "Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth."
I encourage people to watch 9/11: Blueprint for Truth on youtube. It is a two hour scientific presentation by Richard Gage, founder of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth. It is impossible to provide evidence beyond a reasonable doubt in a three minute video like mine, and I don't claim to do so. I merely draw a comparison and ask people to engage in discussion about it. If you want more evidence for controlled demolition, I would watch this:
9/11: Blueprint for Truth
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b74naeawdCs
- 248 likes, 58 dislikes
-
Top Comments
All Comments (926)
-
@bluerap04 By the way NIST has allready explained why they didn't test for explosives or thermite Preliminary testing showed no evidence that there was any and they had no reason to believe there could have been. Infact asfar as I can tell there are no legitimate findings which show any evidence for thermite or explosives from any source. Infact from what I have seen these findings are no more then a rumor spread by truthers.
-
@bluerap04 NIST states specifically that tower 7 (And ONLY tower 7) attained NEAR freefall (not full freefall) speed for 2.2 seconds during it's collapse. It took far longer then 2.2 seconds for tower 7 to collapse and this 2.2 second period of elevated acceleration is explained. If you watch the penthouse collapsed into the building 8 seconds before the rest of tower 7 collapsed. This created a hollow cavity within the building which helped accelerate the collapse during those 2.2 seconds.
-
obvious controlled demolition the question is who controlled it?
-
@MrAwsome514 No free fall? Then why does NIST admit that there is? Seems that you're smarter than NIST bro, they should have hired you.
As far as the noise, yes, explosives like RDX is loud as hell. But truth seekers aren't saying RDX or other more traditional demolition explosives was used, but more than likely it was nano-thermite.. which was found in the dust samples by independent studies. But NIST didn't test for that either, nor explain why they didn't.
You need new debunking material.
-
@NotableJInx2 9/11 Truth has been hijacked by the 'demolitionists'; who believe somehow a team of blasters wired up all the seven buildings of the WTC with over 65 miles of det cord and silently imploded the buildings - and did this without leaving any seismic evidence (P and S waves)!
-
The guy is not presenting a accurate representation of typical controlled demolitions. Go to YouTube: Implosionworld Explosive Demolition Compilation 2003. Pay attention to the tremendous noise demolitions make. Incidentally Implosion World says no controlled demolitions took place on 9/11. They are the world's leading researchers of controlled demolitions. It is time to move over to Dr. Judy Wood's research.
-
Face it. The truth movement doesn't give a shit about the truth. 9/11 Truth = Lies.
-
Umm..just a problem here. If it was silent bombs, then why does Richard Gage so stubbornly cite firefighters's statements of having heard loud explosions as evidence of controlled demolition?
And no, silent bombs do not exist. Bombs create detonations, which creates air pressure. Given the fact that the earth has an atmosphere, this air pressure creates sound waves.
You kinda confirm my conclusion that truthers have NO FUCKING CLUE about physics. Thank you.
-
@NotableJInx2 you do realize there are silent bombs used in controlled demo. scientific evidence has shown fragments of chemicals used in such bombs to be found in the area of explosion. Face it. This is controlled demo. No way would a plane make the building fall down. also firefighter who had been at the sight said they kept hearing quiet explosives that were set off simultaneously, which is the way controlled demolition works
- 4:18
Was Building 7 A Controlled Demolition? You Be The Judge - The Time Is Nowby WTC7WasPulled21,470 views
- 1:36
Bill Clinton confronted about Building 7by hoodrivertruth238,257 views
- 4:25
9/11 Evidence of (Controlled Demolition)Bombs Devil Face in Smokeby freeenergy4everyone1,375,223 views
- 8:12
THERMITE USED ON 9/11! Absolute Proof Explosives Controlled Demolition of Towers & Building 7!by 911TruthVideos16,776 views
- 1:42
New Building 7 Footage Showing Controlled Demolitionby WTC7WasPulled65,666 views
- 10:05
9/11 Coincidences (6/19)by NufffRespect3,911,325 views
- 3:59
9/11 Debunked: Controlled Demolition Not Possibleby RKOwens4224,733 views
- 7:21
9/11 NYC Firefighters Controlled Demolitionby thetruthwillout86,070 views
- 4:49
9/11 Towers Controlled Demolition Detailed Explanation, Freefall Speed, Explosionsby tonybiviano35,766 views
- 1:53
Strange things in 911 footage - look closelyby nwodetox35,891,857 views
- 6:02
9/11 Incontrovertible Proof the Government is Lyingby NanoThermite911378,498 views
- 0:29
Tencza apartments controlled demolitionby debunk911myths40,300 views
- 6:58
Rare Amateur 911 Videosby JoesZone7,052,770 views
- 2:13
Controlled Demolition of a 300 Ft. Towerby Edgekay70,397 views
- 1:00
Larry Silverstein admits to having demolished wtc building 7by vinayakaya153,490 views
- 4:16
Controlled Demolition vs. WTC Collapseby muzicmaker200166,592 views
- 0:41
Gettysburg pa tower implotionby clydeburkey13,491 views
- 1:06
911 Rare View of 2nd Hitby 911archive16,833,447 views
- 0:27
Department Store Controlled Demolitionby ericd344,228 views
The most important thing about this video is how they don't play the audio from the REAL demolitions. Instead they just have the audio of the guy talking the whole time. Can anybody tell me why they did this? Because REAL controlled demolitions are LOUD AS HELL! The explosive charges used in demolition work can be heard for tens of miles. So why did the towers fall so quietly? I mean really... anyone near the base of the tower should have gone deaf from the blasting...
MrAwsome514 1 month ago 7
@christiantruther86bv Do you have any idea how full of shit you are? No I get it... you think all the towers fell at a free fall speed and that it is evidence that only a controlled demo was possible. But there are two flaws with your story... The first is that even a controlled demo cannot fall at free fall speed. There is allways some resistance to EVERY collapse. Secondly the timing you provide is how long it took to dissapear under the debris cloud... not to reach the ground.
MrAwsome514 1 month ago 2