Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph CV2014 - Tachymetre

A look inside the Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph CV2014 - Tachymetre

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

• Tag
• Heuer
• Carrera
• Chronograph
• CV2014
• cv2010
• Tachymetre

[rogalewski86]

I quite sure that s a replica... You can buy it for Ł150 with original box and papers...

[heliman29]

Jeeze dude, why are you "quite sure"ing me? it's very simple to distinguish this from the cheap China garbage. On "TV" they may look similar but in real life there's no comparison in look and feel. Don't you think it would be a good idea to actually educate yourself before you start dropping those lines? A trained eye would see an improper date font, "saw" rotor attachment hub & misplaced sub-dial groove just to name a few. Watch again... the gen in it's splender. Educate yourself man, educate

[RoosterBoys]

even if it was a replica with box and papers why would you buy a real one if the replica looks just as good as this

[heliman29]

Because the hands don't move on the fake one... because it would have broken after 6 weeks... hello. It also doesn't feel nearly as nice in person... computer videos are much different than reality. Not to mention only losers wear China fake garbage and I call out everyone I see that wears that junk. Sometimes I wait until there's a crowd of his friends (at least 4 hot girls around too) and embarrass the crap out of them.

[delrex11]

gf/fiance just got this watch for me for our wedding day, gently used from the jeweler who made our ring for under $2000.00 Canadian.

Two year warranty from the store, too.

Can't wait to get it.

[heliman29]

Sweet... you'll love it! That's quite a girl you got there!

[CutayyRufinaaa420]

hihí_pâsst_hìér_ñet_reìn_aba_ï­ch_bïñ_sô_èînsäm_wïll_jemãñd_m­ìt_mîa_schréibèñ

[apathy1001]

This watch shown in the video is "NOT Fake" at all.

The Movements are genuine

[Penn1969]

I have got the exact same watch as this, however mine has got the leather strap and it is a genuine tag. I have absolutely no idea why people want fake watches anyway, the whole point of having a prestige watch is because it is what it is. I don't wear my Tag to impress other people, I wear it because I like it, if it was fake then what would be the point?

[lilskratch]

didn't wanna upset you but it's replica cost from $300 - $600. Easiest way to find out the engraved on the machinist should be in black not in gold.

[m4xwl]

just came across this since I'm thinking of buying one. The comments claiming why its a fake are just incredible and dont pass the simplest tests. For example, the previous comment from joshtammi, the rehaut numbers dont line up - have you visited the Tag Heuer website? - They must be showing pictures of fakes on their own website!! go look!! They line up! Also thesdcfa - the smallest chrono is not numbered on the original? Your computer must also be incapable of connecting to Tag website!

[greenophotography]

@ColinSWiseman So, uh, look, you're clearly an idiot. Now, back to your comic books, moron.

[StylinRed]

@ColinSWiseman if that's a fake i want one

[joshtammi]

@apathy1001

naar, the rotor is not a sign its fake, it has correct Geneva striping. this was the old style rotor used by TAG, only newer models have the triangles, it was an addition TAG made later as they round it spun more freely. you can look it up in the model revisions, compare CV2010, and CV2010-1.

Dont worry, the watch is definately a fake, i can vouch for that, but i believe the movement could possibly be real, these are known as frankenwatches, fakes using genuine parts

[joshtammi]

This is a very very very good fake, or possibly a fake case with gen movement. but the tell tale sign is quite simple, dont worry about studying the movement, ive already tried and it looks to be very genuine.

on the dial, the numbers on the rehaut (5, 10, 15, 20, etc) line up with the corresponding minute markers. The real tag does not do this, they are not aligned, how do i know? cause im holding one.

sorry bud, its deffs a fake, but for all i know, that movement could be gen. franken imo.

[apathy1001]

@apathy1001

I retract the Above statement , closely looking at the rotor on the back of the watch it is different than the original,

Thanks to point out Eric1Penna