The importance of peer review
Top Comments
All Comments (153)
-
this is all easilly found and available to see for yourself. The internet was invented as a free information exchange system.
-
"The belief system and assumptive case of 'big bang' to man evolution over eons of time, is so strongly entrenched it is no longer questioned. It is assumed as ‘fact’ even in the face of compelling scientific evidence proving otherwise."
The big bang has nothing to do with evolution, but it is accepted because we see many varying pieces of evidence that helps support the idea of an old universe from microwave background radiation, the constant speed of light, and other things.
-
"Qualified creation scientists "
You lose automatically, but I'll continue dissecting this tripe anyway.
" The reality is though, that for anything to get past the existing peer process all observations must fit the prevailing 'old earth' paradigm."
That's because the evidence points to that, sonny. No evidence of any global flood in one strata or a fossil deposit of all known species found within said layer.
-
@NUTCASE71733 Qualified creation scientists would generally not view the peer process as an evil conspiracy. The reality is though, that for anything to get past the existing peer process all observations must fit the prevailing 'old earth' paradigm. The belief system and assumptive case of 'big bang' to man evolution over eons of time, is so strongly entrenched it is no longer questioned. It is assumed as ‘fact’ even in the face of compelling scientific evidence proving otherwise.
-
Thanks for expressing so clearly WHY peer review is so important. The guy who posted the video response to this doesn't get it at all!
-
Do your tattoos express your personality, or what?
-
You can't be fucking serious...
@WHOwasTALKINGtoYOU
Religious apologists can never win. Belief in something without sufficient evidence is non-logical. They always wind up having to try to convince rational minded people they must prove the nonexistence of god. Well, it's impossible to prove a negative, and the apologists know this. That's why in all logical systems it's up to the proponents of a theory to prove it true, not posit it and expect everyone else to prove it false. SpongeBob? That really stuck it to me. lmao
4me2cclearly 1 year ago 5
@TheReboundingWorld
What does that have to do with anything? I was asking are you really serious tht peer review is some kind of evil conspiracy? If you seriously think that, you need to have your head examined.
NUTCASE71733 6 months ago