The first debate?

Does anybody out there accept it as biblical truth that the bailout plan must be passed? Does anyone out there truly believe that Russia attacked Georgia just because it felt like it, and not realize that Georgia actually started the conflict? Does anybody out there want to continue the Iraq war indefinitely? Is anyone buying McCain's criticism of Obama for not being "Pro-Iraq-War" enough? Does anybody think that it is even remotely, REMOTELY possible that the soldiers in Iraq have been begging McCain to keep them in Iraq from now on? I don't believe it, but that's what this "debate" was about. Of course I use the term debate loosely, as this seemed to me like the same spectacle I have been witnessing for the past 20 years, as legions of democrats have accused their legions of republican adversaries of lowering taxes for the rich, and the legions of republicans have responded by saying that their legions of democratic adversaries were too liberal and wanted to raise taxes.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Debate
• Iraq-War
• McCain
• Obama
• Presidential-Race

[Wizard364]

They're just two sides of the same coin brother. Ron Paul represented REAL change and that's why he's out of the picture. McCain and Obama are really just Neocon and Neocon Lite.

[n8glenn]

Absolutely. I couldn't help but root for Obama in the debate, because McCain is so scummy, but I agree that there is no real difference between them.

[jdcremin]

YES! Good call on the Russia - Georgia conflict. Painting Russia as the agressor is a blantant lie and easily disprovable.

[Somerled1]

Yep, no difference man Glenn.

Soooo lame of a debate and they both agreed on the bailout, wtf?! VOTE 3rd Party!