The Big Lie! - The Pangea Theory

This is a clip from the DVD available at http://www.nealadams.com/sciencedvds.html

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• EARTH
• GEOLOGY
• PANGEA
• THEORY
• WRONG
• 40
• YEARS
• OF
• SCIENCE
• DISASTER
• PHYSICS
• IN
• DARK
• AGES
• HISTORY
• CONSPIRACY
• UFO
• NASA
• Conspiracy

[Zed6t9r]

@WilfredPujanes The Philippines are small with lots of fragment Islands,(Easy to fit anywhere and hard to give direction) So I would say, following the general DIRECTION of this section of movement the Philippines tore away from Vietnam-Hong Kong? Is that what you mean by squished back?The correct procedure would be to get the big (easy) pieces right then worry about smaller (hard) ones as they will fall into place…The ideal result is no or minimal gaps. Has this answered your question?

[WilfredPujanes]

the philippines was squished back then??

[Zed6t9r]

I DISPUTE that Australia was joined to North America. I AGREE with you overall theory, but what made me come to the same conclusion of this expanding theory and that Pangea is not the full picture, is that Australia fits in perfectly with Peru/Chile - South America( align Brisbane with Arida) Then you will also find that PNG fits to Central America

[Zed6t9r]

To prove this (as you have mentioned in another clip) the tear lines (in the Pacific) show DIRECTION and this point to South American. Also shows that China-Japan shows DIRECTION to North America. You will find that this is a much better fit.

[nealadamsdotcom]

@joshjcamara Incorrect. What holds an Atom together? What holds a Rock together. a Solar System, A Galaxy, a universe AS IT GROWS?

Do you NOT understand the concept of GROWTH? SAME DENSITY ADDED MATTER!

[nealadamsdotcom]

@joshjcam Nor are the atoms of the baby flying away from each other EVEN THOUGH EACH SHOULDER SEEMS TO BE ACCELERATING APART.

More cells, More Galaxies, more matter, more GROWING SUNS, super-Novas, more black holes, EXPONENTIALLY GROWING EARTH! The whole and all the parts, Ballance, negative to positive.

Oh,..ONE FORCE, and it's EM in NATURE. Gravity is EM! and it's both attractive and repulsive.

You happen to be in a place where ATTRACTIVE is dominant! Sit between 2 Solar Systems

[nealadamsdotcom]

@joshjcamara All Physicists today disagree that there was AN EXPLOSION. They insist it is an EXPANSION!.

As stupid as BOTH CONCEPTS ARE. New discovery has found that the Universe is "ACCELERATING" OUTWARD. (Going FASTER with time)

SO, this is NEITHER explosion or expansion.NOR NEWTON!

So, what is it?

It's GROWTH! If you were on an atom of the shoulder of a Baby and looked across the void to it's other shoulder, you might conclude the baby was EXPLODING.

It's merely GROWING!

[joshjcamara]

@nealadamsdotcom necessarily propell ALL matter in the universe in every direction until an external force stops it.  Since the universe encompasses everything, we can logically assume that there is no external force to impede it's expansion.

[joshjcamara]

@nealadamsdotcom then I have to, respectfully, disagree with you. The comparison of the universe to a ball of iron is nifty, but I think it's just wrong. You're assertion that the universe is not expanding goes against not only everything I've read about the universe, but also to Newton's First Law of Motion; The velocity of a body remains constant unless the body is acted upon by an external force. If we accept the Big Bang theory, then the explosion that occured 14 billion years would

[joshjcamara]

@nealadamsdotcom I will freely admit that I know very little about electro-magnetic properties. But if what you're saying is based on the idea that the universe is NOT expanding, specifically because it needs a secondary force to do so (by the way, wouldn't that secondary force be the energy expelled during the big bang? And wasn't the 2011 Nobel Prize in Physics given to the three astronomers that discovered "dark energy" - the force that's causing the expansion of the universe to increase?)