Conical Motion 1
Uploader Comments (philosophyforum)
Top Comments
-
And so it begins!!!
Keep them coming University of Philosophy!!!
Regards
RememberingIAM - Erfinder
All Comments (39)
-
@sypha0x Well said! But, just so nobody is confused by the terminology, the vortices point towards "Electric North", which is the center of all spherical bodies. The Electric South direction is the wave field boundaries. Many Blessings friend!
-
@77GSlinger All Vortices turn from West to East and their Apices always point to North. :)
-
@carr60ick Alan, This not representing NaCl, it is a basic Carbon Atom wave field: perfect cube, perfect sphere expanding east/west equator, showing only the north south vortex cones and the ecliptic plane of expansion.
Opposing spirals do rotate in the same direction and therefore Russell was right, because the poles are rotating in opposed directions if you look at the cube from their magetic bases toward the fulcrum of light at the cube's center. Peace Brother and Much Respect!
-
@TheMeansardine clockwise and anti clock wise are the same direction, look down from the north on the left cone and up from the south on the right cone, and you will see that though they may be opposed the motion never changes direction, it only changes from implosion to an unwinding vortex, before being reflected as it's opposite mate again.
Descriptive Geometry helps a lot in being able to mentally image these processes and rotate objects in your mind's eye for studying their details.
-
i thought the two forces wee supposed to be spinning in opposite directions into each other. no?
-
If this graphic is supposed to represent the coming together of sexed opposites to form a stable union for example Na and Cl forming a stable NaCl, then the graphic goes too far. NaCl would not radiate and expand like this from it's equator.
The graphic does however capture the fact that opposing spirals muse rotate in the SAME direction, and the concept of clockwise marrying with anticlockwise rotation is invalid.
-
this make absolutely no sense.
-
@kalish86 That is what this video is about the "curved and divided electro-magnetic Universe, based on the cube and the sphere as they are produced by the wave-field mechanics as detalied by Walter Russell. The gyropscopic pressure zones are of course curved and so are the twin opposing electro-magnetic vortices which center all wave-fields.
This is Sacred Geometry no devious academic mythematics are permitted in this Cosmology. No academic sophistry is used. Lawful geometric proof is used!
-
ok then just send me your first page of text, with postulates and calculation, I can't find it among all the youtube link, if it is just on youtube that is not theory. And explain what you call the "Curved Electric Universe". I want a page that looks like: My theory is based on etc...
-
@kalish86 You are talking in cirlces and refuse to assess the alternative paradigm. You are wasting my time and yours.
I defy you to disprove my work. It will take you about a year to read it all, so I'll talk to you in a year after you have finshed my exhaustive and extensive demolition of academic theories taught in corporate controlled "PSYENCE"!



It represents twin opposing vortices of electrically simulated light. This is the foundation for Walter Russell's Cosmology of Light, which actually explains how our Universe in great detail. His work is far beyond the dumbed down physics taught in academia. He was a true genius and I have confirmed his work in over 600 pages of research on my website. This would be a good place to start. Best Wishes Robert
Google Free Energy and Free Thinking for the details
77GSlinger 3 years ago 5
Thank you Robert for the explanation. We've actually tracked down more information on this and the description will be updated shortly.
philosophyforum 3 years ago