Saucerdotal - The Mystery of UFO Propulsion - addendum 1

There is a logical problem with anti-gravity propulsion for UFOs involving the quantity of energy expended during acceleration. Linear momentum conservation is saved but energy conservation is not.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• ufo propulsion system
• flying saucer propulsion
• Paul Hill
• alien technology
• anti-gravity propulsion

[HemiHead66]

Well, this one is way over my head.

[Bantokfomoki]

@HemiHead66 It's only "over your head" ... IF ... it's right. Otherwise, it's into the 'good idea file'. ;o)

[moya138]

interesting.

[RobMonty248]

@ 8:23, in the supposed alien interview video, there is a point where the general is mad and the alien says telepathically, when we you learn that none of this technology is obtainable with out spirituality. That is what the aliens have we are not using because most people think GOD is Television and they do everything TV says. Meditation leads to the answers though hopefully the truely super smart people out will start to do as christ suggested, ASK to Receive. Meditate and ask, in time youll c

[Bantokfomoki]

My view here is that the earth has had an ET presence since this planet became really interesting to sighted beings. That would be about the Devonian period ... maybe 400 million years. I consider intelligent life not to have evolved until after population one stars existed with a wide variety of elements with which to construct life. So, I wouldn't place the evolution of intelligent life anywhere in the galaxy earlier than say 7 billion years ago. Thus, there's ample time to explore a galaxy.

[chfreund]

@Bantokfomoki BTW, my idea to all your mentioned "UFO phenomenon" is easy: In the case we would explore a planet filled with 6+ billion technologically inferior beings on it, we would collect them, take probes of all kinds of stuff and watch out like hell, that they do not know we exist. Sounds familiar to you? Thats the stuff that movi.... err ... UFO phenomena are made of. ;-)

[chfreund]

@Bantokfomoki Just because one can not disprove a belief this is not a proof that this belief is correct or based on facts. My idea, based on current knowledge is: The probability that we get/got in contact with ET in the tiny time-span that we as a species exist is not noteworthy. I love sci-fi books and funny fiction-stories myself, but as an engineer I have to sadly admit that it is unplausible that there is or has been real ET-life on earth.

[Bantokfomoki]

... and your explanation of the UFO phenomena is... ??? I've encountered thousands of naysayers in my life and they all ... totally without exception ... have one thing in common. They have no ideas of their own to offer. Nothing ... nada ... zip. Give me YOUR ideas ... I gave you mine.

[chfreund]

@Bantokfomoki I am saying, that you can tell a 10th grade pupil to make the approach that you made, because your explanation looks like from the 19th century. The book is a science-fiction mystery book full of assumptions. Don't waste your time with it, or with disproving it. Hill himself writes in almost every relevant sentence things like: "If the UFOs mission is ..." or quotes other people and "Accordingly it looks .... ".

[Bantokfomoki]

I don't really understand what you're trying to say but what I'm trying to prove ... and have done so ... is that travel to other star systems in human life span time frames is impossible in the context of the standard model.

Perhaps you are alluding to relativistic considerations. In this case, you cannot avail yourself of those effects because those velocities are unobtainable by any conceivable means ... forever ... unless ... the currently understood laws of physics are false.