Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Nancy Pelosi's "Smoke to save Children Healthcare Plan!"

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
12,359
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 24, 2009

SCHIP was origanally passed in 1997. However, ten years later Bush vetoed the bill. Now our new and deproved government has repassed this ridiculous bill

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (conservativeco)

  • Anyone who voted in Obama and the DemocRATs that wrote this expansion bill must buy a pack of cigarettes daily to support it.

    You want the SCHIP expansion?

    Do your part - become a smoker

    Government loves SCHIP

    Government loves smokers

    ASH and Tobacco-Free-Kids are damaging the tax gain expected, now is the time to de-fund their programs!

  • Notice how Obama loves SCHIP, and yet he's trying to quit smoking. Good job, Mr. President!

  • Good information! maybe you could slow it down a little so it can be read thourghly. :-)

  • Not faster, slower. :-)

Top Comments

  • Pelosi is useless communist.

  • true and the Republican party was hijacked a long time ago too. There hasnt been a true Republican, a fiscal conservative, since Reagan.

see all

All Comments (51)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @GreenEyeBluey You have to look at this objectively. If the price of cigarettes increases, then fewer people will smoke. I can see some moral problems with not outright banning smoking nationwide, but the most efficient way to end the epidemic is to slowly ween people off. 

  • @crateguy . omg....they don't want people to quite smoking! The taxes on tobacco help fuel a lot of social programs. For example, Clinton added projected 10 year income from taxes on tobacco when he was in office....they have and are already spending the money we don't even have yet. So the government needs those big bad tobacco users to keep on puffin' ...

  • @GreenEyeBluey what's funny is that both presidents had similar stances on domestic issues.

  • Dependancy of governance is GOVERNANCE, not marxist, what the hell?

  • #1 = irrelevant. The age of the people covered is not really very important. Also, could you provide me with a link where Nancy Pelosi (or any of the authors of this bill) refer to 35 year old people as children? I believe those 35 year old people are the mothers of the children. From what I read, the bill "was designed with the intent to cover uninsured children in families with incomes that are modest but too high to qualify for Medicaid."

  • Reason #3 = wrong. Are you claiming a sense of dependency on corporations is any different than one on the government? Beside that, you seem to be claiming that people will become infantile as opposed to simply changing the medium through which they are insured.

    Reason #2 = wrong. You are against raising taxes on cigarettes? Health care costs will inevitably decline as smoking rates decline. One way to make smoking rates decline is to raise the price of cigarettes.

    continued...

  • @Gil2727 you bet! Hey while we're at it, we can buy them from JOHN BOEHNER since he SUPPORTS AND ACCEPTS MONEY GIFTS FROM BIG TOBACCO. Whine about THAT now.

  • @GreenEyeBluey You should read about Reagan.

  • Ok reason number one...... Without the public option it is a sene of dependability on private insurance... liberals are against this.... Kid being insured BRING money into the system since they get sick and die a lot less and still pay into it... read the CBO..... still liberals against mandate without public option.

    The tobacco companies will be there ANYWAY and using a bad to make a good is..... bad?

    I'd keep going but there is never enough room, to explain how confused you guys are

  • TGFO--Thank God for Obama. It's nut cases like the maker of this video that make people brain dead sheep-like followers. Marxism, Communism, Socialism....all of which are different, yet he's called them all. While I don't agree with everything Obama does, I expected it, because it'd be impossible to agree with EVERYTHING unless it's yourself that's prez. So again, this video is complete crap.

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more