introduction to NUCLEAR FUSION as a new source of energy 1/2

im working on this video for quite some time now, and i finally finished it :)

the recent videos about the free energy conspiracy-theory more or less set the stage.

nuclear fusion is quite real, watch the following clip:
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=_MoPydT_Zrg

wikipedia is great when it comes to nuclear fusion, check out the articles about: nuclear fusion, ITER, fusion power, and then you will see where the links will guide you.

the second part will be online soon, ill make it a video response to this one.

feel free to make video responses / ask questions.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• nuclear
• fusion
• wendelstein
• 7-x
• k-star
• ITER
• fission
• energy
• source

[WellArmed]

It's quite obvious you have no idea what you're talking about museken, the fact that an object is surrounded by air molecules has no effect whatsoever on its mass, i think you're confused as to what the definition of mass is. Also its not an objects mass that determines air resistance but its surface area, something with a mass of 1kg could have exponentially greater air resistance than something having a mass of 1000kg dependent on its surface area.

[0pteryx]

Science talk with heavy German accent is winrar.

[kurtilein3]

do you really doubt that nuclear fusion is the source of energy stars use, and can be tapped on our planet as well, or is this a big misunderstanding between us two and the point you want to make is a different one?

[kurtilein3]

i will make a note to come back to you when the ITER experiment goes online.

[kurtilein3]

we did it we did it

we have the evidence

we can do it again

fuck off

JET produced net energy

[kurtilein3]

fission?

what kind of fissionable material is present in sufficient quantities at the surface of the sun, and whats your evidence for that?

[cabbotron]

Nuclear fusion has always been "30-60 years" away...and will continue to be so, ad infinitum.

[cabbotron]

It matters not what length of time proceeds if currently accepted theories about the interactive nature of subatomic particles continues it's current path.