Like to rate videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Like to share videos with friends?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
This video has been removed from your Favorites. (Undo)
Like to Favorite videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
RBMK could have been 'worse' as you pointed out, however such reactor will never be built, certaintly not in the 'west'. In a hypothetical nuclear accident of Gen3+ design, the damage is not to the environment but the public image of the nuclear industry. The only way to have another Chernobyl is perhaps to have Mag. 7+ (at 1000 gal) earthquake and a core breach and maybe... have the containment building blown with a bunker buster. For all to happen at once seems impossible.
I'm not a UN inspeactor, in fact the UN doesnt inspect power plants the NRC does I work for entergy as director of engineering. I worked at TMI after it was safe to go there. EVERY piece but 2 percent of uranium was account for. If you want to speak to Ted Sulivan who worked TMI ill be more then happy to give you his number just to prove my point. You need to educate yourself in engineering and know what the hell you are talking about instead of looking at google for all your answers.
And then I take it that you did not inspect a reprocessing plant in Japan, but merely visited.
You are 26 according to your profile and you are a Director of Engineering? You claim to have worked at TMI in the 80's. Right. Fix your profile. You have to be in your 50's.
"EVERY piece but 2 percent" OK ... thank you for conceding my point which was that not all Uranium was recovered.
I have a Masters Degree in Engineering. I certainly know how to look for credible and reliable sources.
One more question. How is it that you are a Director of Engineering and can get away with such atrocious spelling and English grammar? You consistently mix up "than" (like "easier said than done") and "then" (like "first came the clowns then the elephants"). Every engineering manager that I've ever worked with has demanded much more precision than that. A lack of precision can cause confusion that can eventually lead to an accident.
"ill be more then happy" --> "I'll be more than happy"
How is "self made billionaire" who does live in the US talk about issues that have no link to him? Or someone who doesnt even pay taxes? OR someone who has a companies website that looks like a blind 5 year old made? I think i am going to need a shovel for all the shit you feed me. Harvard grad my ass. First you disagree with me that power plant doesnt produce gigawatts then you agree with me after? Your a moron that tries to understand something that he doesn't.
They were very lucky that there was no fire or explosion. There was no radioactivity spread around. The nearby town was nearly unaffected.
However, you fail to mention that two workers of the three workers that were mixing uranium in a vat died slow death due radiation exposure. One died 12 weeks later, another 7 months later.
The fuel that did not melt was removed from the reactor. But about 1% remains.
August 1993: Dr. Michio Kaku, professor of Theoretical Nuclear Physics at CUNY, evaluated studies conducted or commissioned by the NRC on the amount of fuel left in TMI-2.
Kaku concluded: "The still unanswered questions are therefore: precisely how much uranium is left in the core, and how much uranium can collect in the bottom of the reactor to initiate re-criticality."
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
In a hypothetical nuclear accident of Gen3+ design, the damage is not to the environment but the public image of the nuclear industry. The only way to have another Chernobyl is perhaps to have Mag. 7+ (at 1000 gal) earthquake and a core breach and maybe... have the containment building blown with a bunker buster. For all to happen at once seems impossible.
You are 26 according to your profile and you are a Director of Engineering? You claim to have worked at TMI in the 80's. Right. Fix your profile. You have to be in your 50's.
"EVERY piece but 2 percent" OK ... thank you for conceding my point which was that not all Uranium was recovered.
I have a Masters Degree in Engineering. I certainly know how to look for credible and reliable sources.
"ill be more then happy" --> "I'll be more than happy"
However, you fail to mention that two workers of the three workers that were mixing uranium in a vat died slow death due radiation exposure. One died 12 weeks later, another 7 months later.
The fuel that did not melt was removed from the reactor. But about 1% remains.
August 1993: Dr. Michio Kaku, professor of Theoretical Nuclear Physics at CUNY, evaluated studies conducted or commissioned by the NRC on the amount of fuel left in TMI-2.
Kaku concluded: "The still unanswered questions are therefore: precisely how much uranium is left in the core, and how much uranium can collect in the bottom of the reactor to initiate re-criticality."
You don't get my point.