Speaking as a non-Christian, I'd like to point out a few flaws in the latter part of your argument. First, very few people were literate at the time, and most of them were Romans who felt threatened by Christianity. That explains why there are so few documents from the time. There were documents from the time, namely Paul's epistles. Paul did live when Jesus was supposed to have lived, but he did not believe that Jesus was an earthly man.
Show me prophecies that have not came true and I will disprove your words in a friendly proveable way. Heres a few names Clement of Alexandria, Origen, Eusebius, josephus
Tacitus about jesus.Nero fastened the guilt . . . on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of . . . Pontius Pilatus, and a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judaea, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome
The Roman historians would not have written about Jesus because they didnt Know about him until his greatest Prophecy (my opinion)came true and the dead sea scrolls really confirm this. writings from
Mark differs from the other writers in that he specifies the rooster crowed once after Peter's first denial and again after his third denial. But, do these differences represent a legitimate contradiction? Do they indicate, as some critics charge, that the Bible is not from God? Absolutely not!
I know you keep saying here not to use the bible to prove the bible, but you keep trying to use it to disprove it. So many problems with your lack of study of the bible. You said no where does it say his bones would not be broken. Psalms 34:20 and I dont think those soldiers would have know of this and deleberatly not broken his bones.
Speaking as a non-Christian, I'd like to point out a few flaws in the latter part of your argument. First, very few people were literate at the time, and most of them were Romans who felt threatened by Christianity. That explains why there are so few documents from the time. There were documents from the time, namely Paul's epistles. Paul did live when Jesus was supposed to have lived, but he did not believe that Jesus was an earthly man.
civisromae 4 years ago
Show me prophecies that have not came true and I will disprove your words in a friendly proveable way. Heres a few names Clement of Alexandria, Origen, Eusebius, josephus
artdecocoz 4 years ago
Tacitus about jesus.Nero fastened the guilt . . . on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of . . . Pontius Pilatus, and a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judaea, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome
artdecocoz 4 years ago
The Roman historians would not have written about Jesus because they didnt Know about him until his greatest Prophecy (my opinion)came true and the dead sea scrolls really confirm this. writings from
artdecocoz 4 years ago
Mark differs from the other writers in that he specifies the rooster crowed once after Peter's first denial and again after his third denial. But, do these differences represent a legitimate contradiction? Do they indicate, as some critics charge, that the Bible is not from God? Absolutely not!
artdecocoz 4 years ago
I know you keep saying here not to use the bible to prove the bible, but you keep trying to use it to disprove it. So many problems with your lack of study of the bible. You said no where does it say his bones would not be broken. Psalms 34:20 and I dont think those soldiers would have know of this and deleberatly not broken his bones.
artdecocoz 4 years ago