@DRUM57IX It doesn't affect the signal on the user end ... it affects the signal on the SERVER end ...who you want to get access to. It limits how fast they can provide service to you, and the more service they want to provide, the SLOWER their service becomes. Billion dollar corporations like Google or Microsoft can always buy a near infinite number of subdomains, and redirect traffic to load balance and keep all service running fast, but entrepreneurs and small businesses CAN'T. NO ES BUENO!
@normalpsychology Of course he's against it. He is a small time web producer. Net Neutrality will INCREASE the cost of his operation and make it harder for him to produce. On the other hand, billion dollar corporations like Google and Microsoft don't mind because the increased cost is negligible to them. Net Neutrality will make it harder for entrepreneurs and small businesses to provide web services to customers, making it hard for them to create new jobs. THIS IS BAD!
"It's easy to distill topics like that down to jinoistic phrases." = "I have absolutely no idea what you're asking me about, but I'm praying that my use of the word jingoistic will make me appear smarter than I really am."
@halloranedward No it's not. It seeks to slow down smaller websites (which is censorship) and eventually kill off smaller websites. Net Neutrality is GOOD. I still am surprised Steven messed this one up.
YOu can haz a curbstomping, you quebecian cunt
DJpopel 6 days ago
hurp a durp...
This video gave me brain damage.
planet1000 1 week ago
@DRUM57IX It doesn't affect the signal on the user end ... it affects the signal on the SERVER end ...who you want to get access to. It limits how fast they can provide service to you, and the more service they want to provide, the SLOWER their service becomes. Billion dollar corporations like Google or Microsoft can always buy a near infinite number of subdomains, and redirect traffic to load balance and keep all service running fast, but entrepreneurs and small businesses CAN'T. NO ES BUENO!
HumbleWillis 1 week ago
@normalpsychology Of course he's against it. He is a small time web producer. Net Neutrality will INCREASE the cost of his operation and make it harder for him to produce. On the other hand, billion dollar corporations like Google and Microsoft don't mind because the increased cost is negligible to them. Net Neutrality will make it harder for entrepreneurs and small businesses to provide web services to customers, making it hard for them to create new jobs. THIS IS BAD!
HumbleWillis 1 week ago
Steven Crowder, you are clearly a pompous moron.
flipsyde24 2 weeks ago
"It's easy to distill topics like that down to jinoistic phrases." = "I have absolutely no idea what you're asking me about, but I'm praying that my use of the word jingoistic will make me appear smarter than I really am."
P.S. Al Franken is a big fat idiot.
koyunbaba73 3 weeks ago
Is it just me or do all of those laughs sound fake?
TiconderogaX 1 month ago
@halloranedward No it's not. It seeks to slow down smaller websites (which is censorship) and eventually kill off smaller websites. Net Neutrality is GOOD. I still am surprised Steven messed this one up.
normalpsychology 1 month ago
Al Franken got to have a whole decade already, why does he have to louse up the 21st century.
halloranedward 1 month ago