The Universe in 3 minutes

Over-simplified explanation of the origin of the universe.
Hope this has helped you understand the universe moreso than before :)

Category:

Education

Tags:

• cosmology
• astrophysics
• astronomy
• big
• bang
• origin
• of
• the
• universe
• infinity
• JPinfinity
• quantum
• physics
• flucuations
• planetary
• formation
• stellar
• star
• sun
• nuclear
• fusion
• evolution
• proof
• earth
• god
• atheism

[noneofyob1zz]

"Could have..was believe....about...it is thought."

All these phrases R just human being theories. Man made theories tend to change with in time. There is no proof that any of this occurred because there was no eye witness account to these events. The earth, the Universe and all it's inhabitants had to be created by Some thing or Some one. It's all been put together so meticulously.

The human form, From head to Toe,every organ serves a purpose(much like the earth)That's more than enough proof.

[JPinfinity]

Oh there is plenty of proof. AND "could have, believed, about, it is thought" is purely the language of science. Nothing is 100% in science, not even gravity.

[rednecktrucker1969]

nice, maybe want to read it through a couple more times before reading it on "tape". I have had to learn that one the hard way as well.

[JPinfinity]

Haha, thanks for the tip.

[KorrazonCold]

ARE YOU GRAVIATIONALLY PULLING YOURSELF, OR IS IT JUST MAGIC?

[KorrazonCold]

CRAP!

[10gacituao]

@JPinfinity  actually there is no proof of the big bang.

[Billythebearst]

Man. This guy has a very big vocabulary.

[gordon5cc]

@noneofyob1zz Ah a Christian seems to have wondered into the wrong part of Youtube. Go to from once you came!

[bigpeterc626]

Beavis - Hehehe. What did he say?

Butthead -Uhhhhh. Huh huh huh. I don't know.

[Cali13ur]

@Cali13ur Also, Quasar red shift is observed to be quantized. This means the Earth must be at the center of the universe in order for the Big Bang model to be true. Quasars brightness does not correlate to their observed red shift as it does with galaxies. This would refute the notion of “expanding space” and the big bang.

[Cali13ur]

I don't repute that String Theory is only a theory, and in its current form may not be true. But the nature of theories is to be built upon; parts are discarded while others are added.

Also, I mentioned before that we know for sure of four dimensions for High School physics to function at all. However for complex physics to be unified it is NECESSARY for there needs to be more (6), but for string THEORY, 11. Again, NO scientific paper denies 6 dimensions.

Now I forgot, where were we disagreeing?

[Peterwhitlock]

@Cali13ur

Is String Theory Even Wrong? Just for starters...then learn THEORY and why theories die

you will see that THEORY and reality are different things and String theory does not stand up much on it's own and has an INFINITY problem. The SIZE reality we live in proven to be size related and not string theory related. big bang is a collision of two super mass objects we have to call singularities and even HEAVY POTENTIALS as all black hole cores are potentials. beyond quasars= BIG Bang makers