Upload

MICHAEL SHERMER CHALLENGE (Ghosts? E.T.s? "Random BLOTCHES"?) Weigh in!!

Kenda DeMorse Kenda DeMorse·51 videos
49
488 views

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like Kenda DeMorse's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike Kenda DeMorse's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add Kenda DeMorse's video to your playlist.

Published on Jun 25, 2012

WATCH ON "SMALL SCREEN" SETTING FOR BEST DETAIL Intact Footage; EMF particles rearrange into curious forms...RANDOM? DELIBERATE? (Dr. Shermer says random) YOU be the judge!

Dr. Michael Shermer is best known for being founding publisher of Skeptic Magazine, might as well go right to the top for answers! (If he doesn't know what this particular phenomena is, maybe he knows someone who does.)

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.

Uploader Comments (Kenda DeMorse)

  • twsbbl

    You need to provide much more detail here. What camera was this recorded with, what setting used, what were the basic lighting conditions in the room, what if any other devices were plugged into the same circuit as the camera, etc. This is likely just amplification or read noise from the sensor due to low light in the room. It occurs randomly per frame, and randomly per pixel, so Shermer is right. It's random.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate twsbbl's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate twsbbl's comment.
  • Kenda DeMorse

    Amid the sea of "scathing" (And I am being deliberately facetious here- having received a plethora of comments alluding to my 'deplorable grammar'- INTENTIONAL BOYS!!) comments from Doc's friends- thank you for giving the situation some thought! I'm not certain about the circuit load- don't know what difference shared load would make (but it definitely SOUNDS viable)- the progression of activity is distributed over multiple frames...what you're looking at is good old-fashioned low-light snow.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Kenda DeMorse's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Kenda DeMorse's comment.
    in reply to twsbbl (Show the comment)
  • Kenda DeMorse

    (Continued)Whether this is sensor 'read noise,' electrical interference, or particles in the ambient electromagnetic field -though we, in the physical realm, may have no point of reference or experience with what they represent, these forms/shapes seem to have structure...they emerge, remain static for a number of frames and dissolve AS A UNIT.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Kenda DeMorse's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Kenda DeMorse's comment.
    in reply to twsbbl (Show the comment)
  • Kenda DeMorse

    (Continued) I am not concerned with identifying the SOURCE of the phenomena- E.T., human disembodied energy, physical human psyche, whatever- just recording, observing and presenting the activity for what it is at this point.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Kenda DeMorse's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Kenda DeMorse's comment.
    in reply to twsbbl (Show the comment)
  • Chuck Cecil

    There are two malfunctions with these pictures. One with the camera, and the other with your parietal lobes. Do you honestly expect to accept a technological problem to be interpreted as metaphysical interference? You must be desperate for some sort of emotional validation here.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Chuck Cecil's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Chuck Cecil's comment.
  • Kenda DeMorse

    My parietal lobes are fine thank you...just trying to prod brainiacs into THINKing about the possibilities here- AND it wouldn't be the first time a discovery was made using a device in a fringe fashion (consult the "Robot Hand" episode of "Big Bang Theory")

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Kenda DeMorse's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Kenda DeMorse's comment.
    in reply to Chuck Cecil (Show the comment)

All Comments (9)

Sign in now to post a comment!
  • Kenda DeMorse

    I sent Dr. Shermer the link to "The Challenge" -Overnight the number of views went from 4 to 204. Intelligent comments too- "...EMF stands for Extremely Meaningless Footage" Whoa. (What is this -8th grade?) :0 )

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Kenda DeMorse's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Kenda DeMorse's comment.
  • Loading comment...
Loading...
Loading...
Working...
Sign in to add this to Watch Later