Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

CIT witness for the Northern Approach pt.2

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
803 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jun 19, 2010

A path of the alleged AA77 north of the Citgo gas station would not just contradict the official story, it also contradicts instincts and logic.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (achimspok)

  • I know your working on discovering the real truths about 911. This officer is one of 2 officers interviewed in the Pentagon investigation done by the citizen group. They and the witnesses at the Navy Annex and the cemetery workers and shops of the north side gave their north side accounts as well. Are you concluding that the 2 police officers and other Annex witnesses and workers who gave interviews for the historical archives and the citizen group did not see a north approach as they claimed?

  • @rushfan9thcmd It seems there is not much room for interpretation. Of course, CIT claims that the entire video is faked but why faking a scene that looks pretty much like "conspiracy". LOL

    Lagasse called some witness telephon and told them he was 15-20 seconds after the crash at the Pentagon helping people to get out. He really doesn't lookk like in a hurry. ...just my opinion.

see all

All Comments (12)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Any person who thinks that A PLANE hit the pentagon PLEASE you right HERE type in Pentagon Employee Says No Plane Used On 9/11..She actually tells the REAL TRUTH!!! Any person who doubts also should go to WTC south tower collapse in slow motion in HD..LOOK AND SEE THE REAL VIOLENCE OF TRUTH!!

  • "Sunday 1/1/1993" datestamp on the video. Epic fail.

  • This is what happened to one plane after being struck under the wing (not a leading edge) by a piece of titanium measuring 3 cm wide and 43 cm long:

    /watch?v=BEHoaYMsP9Q

    This is what happened to a high performance acrobatic plane flown by a highly skilled pilot after hitting a purpose designed break-away pylon:

    watch?v=T8nK6kbTzhk

    How many light poles did Fl.77 knock over again? 5?

    As far as I am concerned this should be considered in any investigation of witnesses.

  • Any interpretation involving an airplane hitting lamp poles at a couple of feet above the ground and continuing straight and level for hundreds of yards afterwards should be discarded.

    The fact that what hit the Pentagon wasn't anything other than a tumbling fireball leaving a scattered trail of debris excludes that line of reasoning.

  • sorry there was no plane at pentagon, i can remember the footage clearly from that day in the uk and it showed no plane or parts

    if you look at the still footage realised, you will see orbs and a laser beam hitting pentagon it was fired from the blue and white helicopter

    i wouldn't believe any those witness from pentagon.

    your looking for the white elephant hologram light show

  • You're assuming that the time stamp on the security footage is accurate to real time. It's just a rinky-dink security system. It seems pretty obvious that the plane flew by at about 9:40:39 security camera time judging by the reactions and movement of the people inside the quick-mart. Legasse left about 20 seconds after this and in a hurry. I realize it's poor quality footage, but it looks like he spun the rear tires a bit once he started going forwards.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more