Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

RE: Creation in common sense [Part 1 of 3]

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
2,721
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
  • likes, 7 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (91)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Has your creationist propaganda machine been slowed down by your 10 year prison sentence for tax fraud? Let your son carry on the illogical arguments! He doesn't even need any education, training, or to perform a single second of actual research!

  • Newtonist would have been a better title then Gravitiest.

  • Is it just me or does the narrator sound like Egon from Ghostbusters. 

  • I think Eric Hovind is worse than his father.

  • hehehe...your stupid *points and laughs*

  • yup, an epic statement of ignorance...

    @RockSmith: Don't forget about the nylon consuming bacteria, those are pretty substantial... Unless there was nylon in the "garden of eden" *rolls eyes*

    Oh, and 1:06 please!

  • wow...the post you just stated couldn't be anymore wrong. First of all, evolution does not explain the origin of life or the universe, it explains the diversity of life. Secondly, Micro-evolution, is variation within the same species while macro-evolution is analysis of evolution in separate gene pools(this means a species becoming it's own species). This has been observed so many times such as Darwin's finches, the Californian Salamanders, hawaiian drosophila(flies), etc.

  • Evolutionism is not science. There is no proof of macro-evolution. There is no proof of chemical evolution, planetary evolution, organic evolution, & other evolution. The only 'evolution' that occurs is micro-evolution which is simply natural selection and variation. This is the only thing that scientists witness. Nobody witnessed the other evolution. plants & animals can't gain new genes by mutation. They lose their current genetic information by mutation.

    "Too slow to see"? That's faith

  • @rogan71

    Yeah, ignorance is one thing; the level of wilful ignorance that some of these creationists display is something else again..

  • It's willful ignorance based on fear...Confused with hope. None of us want to die, and none of us want to see our loved ones die... Religion is just a reaction to this.

    I think they would be worthy of our pity...If they weren't so annoying.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more