Top Comments
All Comments (68)
-
can you imagine what it's like to play with 48 people who have all tanks, helicopters, explosives, guns, and lots of other stuf in their power and on top of it you can destroy everything?, i mean who says that call of duty is better? youre a fool if you still thinks so
-
@skaterT17 4 ppl in on one sqoad one server will have abouth 5 or 6 squads every server has 2 teams so its a random 48 players in a full server
-
BF3 > BFBC2 > MW2 > MW3 > COD:BO
-
i know everyone in here got the game, but want to see the video ....virtual high five!
-
@freddy692000 bf3 will make mw3 and all other cod's go out of buisness because of the simple fact cod sucks ass and you cant handle the realism
-
@Zomakoguy better physics, another level graphics engine, teamwork, AND stuff that actually destructs is AWESOME
-
i have mw2 and bc2. they both very good but bc2 takes it for being more epic
-
@GrubbyNumber thing is more ppl like the cod franchese and more ppl play cod so sry
-
that sergent looks like sergent johnston from halo
-
I played MW2 for 1 month and thought it was cool...then I played ONE game on BFBC2 and realised this is how it is supposed to be. No campers,no care packages and a proper area for everyone to spreadout and play. MW2 is too frantic, claustrophobic and boring after a while.
@freddy692000 1:not heavy...
2: better graphics than mw2...
3: guns are more realistic than in mw2...
4: the army has tanks irl, so it makes it more realistic...
5: its NOT infinity ward...
6: it needs to be huge otherwise it will be a tiny arena like in modern warfail 2..
7: stuff breaks so that pepole cant camp like in mw2...
BFBC2 > MW2
Zomakoguy 1 year ago 65
BFBC2 FTW!!
terriblete67 2 years ago 33