MoonFaker: Dude, Where's My Star? PART 2

http://www.moonmovie.com
http://www.billkaysing.com
http://www.ralphrene.com
http://www.moonhoax.us

"Seeing the bright blue sky turning pitch-black and seeing stars appear while it is daytime is absolutely mind-blowing." Michael Melvil, SpaceShipOne

"We were never able to see stars from the lunar surface or on the daylight side of the moon by eye without looking through the optics" - Neil Armstrong, Apollo 11

"If you were standing on the moon you would indeed see the stars, even during the day." - Phil Plait, Bad Astronomy


Jarrah White would like to invite you to see the Apollo 11 footage that Svector, Phantom Wolf and Shane Killian have tried to suppress from public view.

APOLLO XI: THE LITTLE GEM
http://moonhoax.us/littlegem.htm

See also the evidence of faked and suppressed Apollo 10 footage that Mark Gray doesn't want you to see.

FLAGGING THE GEMS
http://moonhoax.us/flagginggems.htm

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• MoonFaker
• Apollo
• 16
• Ultraviolet
• UV
• Star
• photos
• photographs
• Hoax
• Conspiracy
• Bill
• Kaysing
• Jarrah
• White
• JW
• Studios

[yesiamawizardjonny]

Jarrah, I don't want to be rude, but don't you think stars is not the reason man went to the moon? It was to explore the lunar surface. If you can see the same stars from Earth, why would they care to take pictures of them from the moon??

[WhiteJarrah]

@yesiamawizardjonny

Studying the stars from moon is a huge advantage over studying them from the earth. The earth's atmosphere blocks out some of the starlight and the twinkling we see is a distortion due to starlight being refracted through the miles and miles of air. A binary star can look like a single star as a result of this.

Space-based observatories and definitely moon based observatories would be free of this issue for obvious reasons.

[BlisterHiker]

Here is a good video that explains that stupid "no stars" argument.

Actually, in some pictures the brightest stars are visible, but with brightness/contrast enhanced, we can see more. See and believe!

watch?v=76gn3Z2CCU4

[WhiteJarrah]

I've seen that video and read the comments. I've noticed that various pro-NASA guys commenting have claimed those stars are negative pin-holes or cosmic rays.

[joerogandotnet]

These videos just never stop coming.

It's getting harder and harder for people to dismiss them. Someone needs to show some of this footage to the mythbuster guys.

[WhiteJarrah]

"Someone needs to show some of this footage to the mythbuster guys."

If we're talking about the Mythbusters, one of their lies are discussed

Here: watch ? v = 1rvmBEsTcoU

And here: watch ? v = zCD4lY13D1E

[tenthousandyearsgoon]

Jarrah you are awesome. Another great video

[yesiamawizardjonny]

@WhiteJarrah Hubble does cancel out the atmospheric distortion though, right?

[huskyjerk]

I don't see stars in the Space Station video. Do you? So, .....

[Cougar139tweak]

TremorHellborn: Master of the Ad Hominem attack

aka: Douche :)

[SpectralForm]

its like when we discovered america,but just stay at the beach,never borther to explore the inland....and return to europe with tales of a small beach...now that would be considered as a missed opportunity...now these man were explorers,so its logical to explore....what is nasa? nuthing to do with exploring,so i wonder what is there 'plan'.......wanna see vegas?ok but keep ur eyes on the sidewalk.....?

[TremorHellborn]

Jarrah White: Master of Deception

aka: LIAR!!!

[BlisterHiker]

Sure... and somehow they fit positions of the stars. Coincidence? No. The stars are there, on the edge of dynamic range of the film.

Some stars are visible without brightness/contrast enhanced. Check this out for example: AS14-66-9232HR and believe, whitejarrah.