(ML 7.1) Bayesian inference - A simple example
Loading...
3,053
Loading...
Uploader Comments (mathematicalmonk)
see all
Video Responses
This video is a response to (ML 6.3) Interpretation of MAP as convex combination
see all
All Comments (9)
-
great presentation! keep up the good work :)
-
but, you really don't need to give a 2-min story and draw figures of "Tom" and "Coach".
-
Bah, I meant, "that you should think the football field is _smaller_ than ..."
-
Isn't the coaches willingness to bet against you more information that you should think the football field than you believed before you heard the bet?
Consider that I want to bet against you. There are 100 things that we both think we know well enough to bet on. You honestly list your beliefs on those 100 things. Then I choose the 5 that I am most willing to bet against you on. I'd guess you are going to lose money.
-
Wow! Thanks for this great video
Loading...
why are you using x bar instead of mu? Wouldn't the measurement be the population instead of the sample size?
phatdaddy9 5 months ago
@phatdaddy9 I'm having difficulty understanding your question. Can you restate it in a different way?
mathematicalmonk 5 months ago
@mathematicalmonk
Sure no problem. Why are you using the mathematical notation for the sample distribution, when you are taking the population distribution? Am i missing something?
phatdaddy9 5 months ago
@phatdaddy9 I'm using the usual notation for the sample mean: given random variables X_1,...,X_n, the sample mean is \bar X = (1/n) sum_i X_i.
There's not really a "population" here. The closest thing to a population distribution in this example would be the Normal(theta,1) distribution we are assuming for the measurements. But note that in fact theta itself is a random variable in our model. (I haven't used "mu" anywhere in this video, but I could have used "mu" instead of "theta".)
mathematicalmonk 5 months ago