RE The Evolution Hoax Part 1
Loading...
Loading...
372
views
Loading...
Uploader Comments (Setar)
Video Responses
This video is a response to Way Of The Bastard (pt1)
Loading...
9:23
RE The Evolution Hoax Part 2by Setar239 views- 9:52
The Evolution Hoax- Part 1by MoooHamMad18,176 views
- 8:47
Evolution Hoax - Like a Dolphin Could Evolve !by WTU2081,397 views
- 5:58
KEN HAM IS AN IDIOT part 1A of 3 (or 4)by dechha19819,006 views
- 9:57
The Signs Part 4 (The Evolution Hoax)by worldwakeupmusic7,348 views
- 2:19
Imagine If All Atheists Left Americaby neotropic9250,097 views
- 5:51
Evolution, the biggest hoax ever...by JustATruthSeeker5,243 views
- 57:22
Evolution is history's greatest hoax / the lie of Darwin's theoryby CtKpresident1,921 views
- 4:37
Pat Buchanan Climate Change and Evolution a Hoax, a sham and a lie!by rackjitekick2,078 views
- 10:59
Labyrinth Of Truth pt 9 Evolution Hoaxby TheWatcherReptilian217,812 views
- 11:00
Evolutionists Debunk Evolutionby orlibonurb290 views
- 10:45
Evolution proved to be a HOAX!!!!!!!!!!by topsecretdoomsday7,808 views
- 10:21
RE Origin Into Schools part 1by Setar253 views
- 1:25
Re: Brainwashed Atheists of Youtubeby DawnOfTheLiberalDead593 views
- 11:12
Jonathan Sarfati - Evolution, The Greatest Hoax On Earth (2 of 2)by orlibonurb312 views
- 7:05
KEN HAM IS AN IDIOT part 1B of 3 (or 4)by dechha19814,283 views
- 3:19
Proof that evolution is hoaxby AngelArcha2,295 views
- 4:26
The Evolution Hoax- Part 2by MoooHamMad4,905 views
- 4:25
The City Harmonic - Manifesto (OFFICIAL)by thecityharmonic1,338,480 views
- 5:39
False evidence of evolution : The Piltdown Man hoaxby Yaratilistr330 views
hey like the vid man, but your wrong only on the radiometric dating part. it becomes ineffective after 60,000 years, but we have more ways of dating, such a argon argon dating, k isotope dating, etc.
to estimate the age of the earth we use a combination of dating methods and the geologic column time scale based on our fossil records.
generosos87 2 years ago
I thought I mentioned that...I did a bit on radioactivity in Science 10 and we went through some of the dating methods. If I made an error with carbon dating it was using 50,000 instead of 60,000, though the technical figure would be about 57,300 years (ten half-lives almost exactly).
Setar 2 years ago