Election 1992 - Part 3
Loading...
Loading...
5,407
Loading...
10:55
Election 1992 - Part Fourby ajs414,396 views- 10:55
Election 1992 - Part 2by ajs416,172 views
- 4:59
Election 1992 - Part 12by ajs414,220 views
- 10:36
Election 1992 - Part 15by ajs414,734 views
- 8:23
Election 1992 - Part 14by ajs413,448 views
- 6:31
Election 1992 - Part 13by ajs413,702 views
- 10:56
Election 1992 - Part Sixby ajs413,891 views
- 10:58
Election 1992 - Part 42by ajs412,048 views
- 10:56
Election 1992 - Part 45by ajs412,401 views
- 7:55
Election 1992 - Part 39by ajs412,751 views
- 10:59
Election 1997 - Part 16by ajs414,954 views
- 10:55
Election 1992 - Part 25by ajs414,628 views
- 10:51
Election 1992 - Part Sevenby ajs413,915 views
- 3:52
Election 1992 - Part 40by ajs412,365 views
- 3:07
Election 1992 - Part Nineby ajs415,028 views
- 10:58
Election 1992 - Part 35by ajs413,085 views
- 10:56
Election 1992 - Part 41by ajs412,566 views
- 1:34
Election 1992 - Part 32by ajs412,597 views
- 1:05
Election 1992 - Part 21by ajs414,410 views
- 11:00
Election 1992 - Part 34by ajs412,754 views
From Manchester pre emptive celebrating with jugglers, clowns and facepainting.
Man, we need to celebrate - get the jugglers in!!!
mrbeancounter90 10 months ago
The swingometer is back, hooray! They should have had it in 1983 and 1987.
It showed the 8% swing Labour needed to get into power - a huge insurmountable mountain. In 2010 the Tories needed a 7% swing.
swanarcadian 1 year ago 2
George Alagiah looks so young here.
LKayL1 1 year ago
@ajs41 Also, Labour's vote looks likely to collapse at this election in favour of the Lib Dems. The Tory vote held fairly strongly in 1992.
Matt7895 1 year ago
Nicholas Fairbairn - now there's a blast from the past!!! lol!!! Staunch defender of Mrs T from north of the border. Use to wear striking trousers i think.
chrishoy77 1 year ago
Also, the Tories in 2010 don't have Neil 'Well All Right!' Kinnock to bugger things up quite so spectacularly at the last minute.
RichLN 2 years ago
The difference of course is that Major was defending a majority of 102 in 1992 and an 11% lead in the share of the vote, whereas the equivalent figures for Brown in 2010 are a majority of 48 (after boundary changes) and only a 3% lead.
So if Brown does as well as Major did in 1992 - losing about 40 seats - he'd probably find it difficult to hold onto power, even though that would be a pretty good result for him.
ajs41 2 years ago