I. Anarchy
Top Comments
All Comments (3,023)
-
If they establish villages and councils and such then it would no longer be Anarchy. the councils would be rulers. What he explains is a democratic confederacy.
-
you have described the Marx ideology of communism in its simplest. Anarchy does not work for countries or even city's, it is an idealised form of communism pushed by people who have no concept of it, but just want change. communism doesn't work, plain to see when you consider that there are no truly communist governments on the world
-
coolio.
idk why. but it was just awesome
-
@!!!!!!!!!!! now!
-
@freelancehuman what?lol
-
I think my comments are more on-target - IJ6tjN4V6wQ
-
@oshun1235 They did. I think a modern version of tribalism with moralistic people like we have now (for the most part) would be quite successful. I do wonder though if people would regress. We haven't experimented much with anarchy, so we don't really know.
-
@KevZen2000 So, they're just terrorists?
-
@Z6U6Z6U And is just an impossible dream which relies on the assumption that all human biengs are moral at heart and have no desire for power.
-
Anarchy: now you can take anarchy back from the CIA: evict the CIA from your country, your town, your family, and your self.
FUCK YOU COMMUNITY C !
dududugary 2 months ago 27
5th:Doesnot explain how the communities will stop C as they don't have weapons(or at least not good such C once.How they will coo-operate when they will have different thinking of how to stop community C??? Or how when there will not be Minister of National Defence?
So for as I understood anarchy CANNOT increase a country's power and has gaps to fix.
The most fitting policy for me is Democracy(we don't leave in democracy don't be treated!) and not this kind of policy
21LeoNidasZ 1 month ago 3