Russia,Japan,France,China,S.Korea,Tank autoloader comparision
Top Comments
All Comments (147)
-
@xtasytube the t-90 ms variant can load in 4 seconds too?
-
In terms of speed the differences between a human loader and autoloader are negligible. Other reasons like turret or gun design have more influence on the the kind of loading system used than one just being faster than the other. Though I imagine for countries with small Armies and low recruitment rates, it would be more desirable to cut back on the loader with an automatic system to economize on personnel.
-
You're right, man. Japanese guy madevideo I dislike South Korea. Okay?
-
S.Korea K1a1 or K2 tanks Which do you like better?
-
@Griffon868 oh hmm ok dumb ass
-
@RobotN001 The abrams A-1 dosent have 1 lol, there loader is a person
-
Type90 win.
-
@eikkkN go to wiki and read technical parametres. Leclerc lose T90 in this params. 1) Fire range 2) Mass 3) Overall dimension 4) Cost 5) Repair ablity in the field 6) Dinamic armor but win in: 1) Top speed stop trolling idiot.
-
@nonapolis LOL that was what i said, you don't have any arguments and dont know anything about Leclerc MBT, go away and stop trolling now
-
In World War II T34 was the best tank for the same reasons that the T90 and now can outperform any modern tanks.
the t-90 can load in 4 seconds :)
xtasytube 1 year ago 22
robots gonna win.
where is usa tank autoloader ? =)
RobotN001 6 months ago 3