WTC 7 Collapse Symmetrical?.mov

In response to 9/11 Truthers claims that the collapse was both instantaneous and symmetrical, I allow viewers to examine some footage in detail. We discover that this truther claim is dubious and not really supported by the evidence.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• WTC
• Symmetrical?

[dwheel39]

The "kink" in the Penthouse was most likely the result of detonation. It looks like many controlled demolitions. What you're seeing is the inner columns being taken out.

Here's some video evidence obtained from the FIA..footage NIST was keeping to themselves. Listen for the "boom" just prior to Penthouse collapse. watch?v=XrnmbUDeHus&feature=pl­ayer_embedded

[AlienEntity1]

@dwheel39 Complete speculation and easily refuted by these videos.

watch?v=5tNhnTBzSyQ

watch?v=E8yUR-sM4lU

[Zooney1]

Look Alien I'll put you out of your misery. There are valid criticisms of the Harrit article in particular the fact that the "nanothermite" in the thickness found would not damage anything. Also they have no proper explanation for the silicon content. But the contents of Fe and Al are not as you state and are much higher as evidenced by the Fig 7 spectra but the precise quantities can not be derived from such spectra. Let's leave it at that. Have a good weekend!

[AlienEntity1]

@Zooney1 No, I don't want to leave it just as you're finally realizing that Harrit's own data debunk his claims of nanothermite.

Of course you want to leave the subject, it's embarrassing that you believed something without understanding the data, or even bothering to learn what it was. You just accepted the claim and attacked people like me who are the true skeptics of pseudo science.

None of the chip samples have sufficient Al or Fe to be thermitic. Period. FAIL. They are not thermit

[AlienEntity1]

@Zooney1 Yes, indeed, at the thickness of the layers, they were not capable of doing anything to steel. Harrit/Jones EPIC FAIL

And the chips simply do not have enough Fe and Al by weight to allow a thermitic reaction, by DEFINITION. Harrit/Jones EPIC FAIL

And the chips combust almost 100 C lower than real nanothermite, but curiously at almost the same temp as paint. Coincidence? Not if you look at the XEDS and see the organic binder makes up most of the chips.

Yet truthers still believe

[OneAmatoryScam]

You make a video refuting the symmetry of the collapse wherein you show the kink on one side of the building when there was simultaneously a similar kink on the other side (and at the location of the interior columns coincidentally)? I have a hard time believing you don't understand the meaning of the word symmetry, so this is just blatantly deceitful.

[Zooney1]

@AlienEntity1

You state: DUDE, ANYBODY CAN READ THE DSC CHARTS!!! They show the proportions of elements found. Al and Fe are mostly in tiny amounts. That's a fact.

Yes anybody can read the DSC charts (you meant XEDS charts as you pointed out) and anybody can wrongly interpret them as you clearly have. But the fact that you interpret them with so little knowledge ie stating that they show 1.6% Aluminum and 2.6% Iron oxide is a measure of the vastness of your ignorance.

[Zooney1]

You pretend to understand science when clearly you don't eg the Harrit paper. You have proven this to me by your comments re the XEDS spectra. Furthermore you would not back dowm on your claims of the low Al content even when I gave you an olive branch. This tells me 2 important things 1. You don't knnow what you are talking about yet pretend to and 2, You are incapable of conceding the sligttest point. So I am dealing with someone who is both ignorant and closed minded. Therefore adieu

[Zooney1]

@AlienEntity1

You still don't seem to be able to interpret XEDS data correctly. If you look at Fig 7 the major elemental peaks identified are FE, Al, Si O and C. The peak heights and areas for FE AL O are all substantial. The values you quote are low and wrong and Lord knows which internet blog you got copied them from The XEDS spectra tie in with the observed aluminium platelets and the nano size iron oxide particles seen in the BSE images of Fig 8.

[Zooney1]

@AlienEntity1

Oh dear nere we go again. Er...... no he doesn't "debunk his claims of nanothermite" in fact the evidence from the DSC of chip ignition at around 400degC with the creation of iron rich microspheres is most compelling still. I am just sayting that it is difficult to see how material of that thicjness could damage anything. I am being honest not just adamanly defending one side of the argument. WTC primer paint was stable to 800degC (NIST reference)