Ann Coulter on O'Reilly : Discusses her column on Japan "A Glowing Report on Radiation"

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
115,163
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 18, 2011

This video can be seen http://www.popmodal.com/ March 17, 2011 - "With the terrible earthquake and resulting tsunami that have devastated Japan, the only good news is that anyone exposed to excess radiation from the nuclear power plants is now probably much less likely to get cancer." read full article: http://www.anncoulter.com/

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Seriously, if you're discussing a topic with Bill O'Reilly, and HE's the one who comes across as the voice of reason, you may want to reassess your position on the topic in question.

  • Does anyone else see Rebeca Black's Friday as a suggested video?

see all

All Comments (838)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • BOULDER is in COLORADO not MONTANA- if she couldnt get that right I wonder what else she just lets spew out of her mouth...

  • I bet she has a big cock.

  • @exiteditor Amen to that. Spreading this kind of ignorance is truly shameful.

    I knew a veteran who had been stationed in the pacific during the bikini atol nuclear tests. He removed dead test animals in cages from the ships tested in the blast. Though told it was safe by the navy, by his mid-20s he'd lost almost all his teeth and suffered many major health problems. The govt or military never fully compensated him or admitted responsibility for his health. Radiation is NOT a joke.

  • This woman represents the one of the darkest products of our media culture. People like her have made a fortune taking the news and turning it into entertainment. Maybe at one point they actually believed the things they said, but at this point it has become at its best a soulless quest for money, ratings, and recognition. Say whatever bizarre off the wall stuff you want to if it defends the conservative message.The truth of ones statements no longer matter as long as Ann can sell her books.

  • She may be a risk of getting her head chopped offf

  • eviL

    

  • As Ann Coulter's column points out, the question of radiation hormesis is unproven. Given the benefits of small doses of *other* toxins, her point is not that a toxin is not really toxic: she's just giving balance to the relentless alarmism about radiation.

    Her position, on the general point of the media's sensationalised reporting on the nuclear reactor, is borne out already. The story has died; there is no broad radioactive disaster. The media has long since moved on to other fodder.

  • This is a straw man argument. She is not talking about fission products from a nuclear power plant meltdown. I mean really, she misses the entire point. We are talking about fission, not naturally occurring radiation! Can she really be that stupid? I think so. And by the way I have not heard on physicist who is independent makes the argument that there is nothing to worry about. Anne, why have evacuations??? Go back to college and learn your science.

  • Whaat the fuuuuck is she talking about????....

  • Next Anne Coulter will argue bullets are actually beneficial for the body after some liberals say they dont like being shot

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more