Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

x-ray beam vs. tactical dosimeter / rad protection glove test - radiation sickness imminent. :P

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
4,037
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 24, 2011

re-doing my "x-rays vs. dosimeter" experiment with a nice digital tactical dosimeter. =)
i'm comparing the shielding capability of both thick lead gloves vs. thin bismuth radiation protection gloves on a primary x-ray beam vs. x-ray stray radiation which you would e.g. receive during performing an intracardiac catheter on a patient.

also, at a distance of approximately ONE METER from the x-ray tube's focus, you'd still get a dose rate of 5 Sv/h - enough to make you dead-sick with radiation poisoning after just 30 minutes - IN THEORY! that'd never happen to you if you're having an x-ray exam, though, don't worry. the exposures during x-ray exams are WAY too short. this is just an experimental setup. =)

important: keep in mind that during longer interventions, where transillumination is used - e.g. during cardiac catheters - the x-rays will be PULSED, and not actually provide a constant exposure. this tube is for x-ray radiographs, e.g. an x-ray of your lungs, which are done in just tiny bits of a second.

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (bionerd23)

  • Hi, bionerd!

    Sorry for calling you on your nickname, but I don't know your real name. :D

    Anyway, I have a question for you... what type of x-rays are the most dangerous?

    I've heard that alpha rays, if the radioactive material is ingested... or somehow introduced into the body...

  • @cortexedge

    well, alpha radiation has a very high linear energy transfer (LET), meaning they cause a lot of damage in their "range". they're shielded by the human skin, but when ingested, has a weighting factor of 20, which means it causes 20 times more damage (dose) than a conventional x-ray or gamma ray (weighting factor 1). beta radiation also has a weighting factor of 1, and for neutron radiation, it varies on the speed of the neutron, can be 1-20 (20 for thermal neutrons).

see all

All Comments (58)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • lol the brand of the dosimeter says "FAG"

  • do you work in a hospital of how do you get access to all this stuff???????????

  • at 2:24 u can see the radiation from the x-ray taken

  • I love the "snow" that flashes across the screen whenever the x-ray is run.

  • grazie bionerd23

  • nimm mal den schwanz aus deinem Mund Mädel

  • Are you male or female?

  • @chrisgj198

    yep, having a dark background (and setting the monitor to go "dark" after e.g. 10 minutes of not using the computer) can save you quite a LOT of money, power-wise. =)

    thus, i really liked the earth day "switch" here on youtube that let you turn youtube's background to black, lol. believe it or not, that indeed DID save quite a bit of energy!

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more