WIRELESS'S EMF RADIATION? EVERY TREE A CELL TOWER

THEY HAVE DEVELOPED TECHNOLOGY THAT MAKES OUR TREES AND HOMES CELL TOWERS

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• FSO
• 3G
• 4G
• WiFi
• WiMAX
• wireless
• quantummechanics
• quantum-entanglement
• EMF
• masts
• RF
• ELF
• ULF
• MAGNETIC
• radiation
• non-ionizing
• non-thermal
• satellites
• Bluetooth
• cellphones

[dbootsthediva]

Back in 1981, WHO was singing an entirely different tune about harmful effects U might want to check out WHO's funding prior to 2006 Back in 1981 WHO's standards were that the precautionary principle of science should be honored before advancing technology Take a closer look at WHO's 2006 release WHO, as an interenational agency, no longer puts the precautionary principle first of do no harm

Money talks and everything else walks including misleading a public's perception of harm

[theyellowdart084]

A report issued in 2006 from the World Health Organization (WHO) found no scientific evidence that RF signals from cell towers cause adverse health effects and made the following points: * Up to five times more of the RF signals from FM radio and television (than from cell towers) are absorbed by the body with no known adverse effects on health in the more than 50 years that radio and TV broadcast stations have been operating.

[dbootsthediva]

@theyellowdart084 Yoon Shim Kim 2001 et al: Exposure to Workers to ELF-MF's n Electric Appliances Levels of Personal Exposure to magnetic fields to occupational n non-occupational groups Current Regulations Over 4mG (milliGauss) is unsafe

Indoor: Electrician At Work: 6.4mG Transformer Worker 12.1mG

Medical Computer Operator 4.6mG Subway Driver 3.5mG n those numbers don't even include the total MF they would receive in a 24 hr period of work, home, transporation

CAN'T TRUST WHO

[dbootsthediva]

I think it was the Univ of Seattle that recently released a report that trees retained some form of a small voltage and that this small voltage could be harvested Makes one wonder where this voltage they are attempting to collect came from in the first place Things are not always as natural as others would like us all to believe

[thesilverfalcon]

I would like to present this from a different angle. Think about all the possibilities. What is different about the trees on the right? Are they transmitting radio waves or other types of radiation? Perhaps, but first look only on what is there. What's different? What could be causing that effect on those trees, but not the others? The main thing that jumps out at me is the sun; it is above the trees on the right side.

[dbootsthediva]

In 2002 The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC added to it's list that extremely low frequencies (ELF)

magnetic fields were now to be thought of as possible carcinogenic to humans Wireless technologys = ELF's Seems common sense would be pointing us at a factor that not all wireless technologys harm is just from the cell powers n instead the wireless technologies r now at a higher risk of harming the public of creating EM damage to our cells Think about the possibilities

[chewy531]

Maybe this explains why I don't get a cell signal when I'm in the woods in the middle of nowhere.... oh wait, shouldn't I actually get perfect cell reception if I'm within 500 feet of any tree then?

[Sarahjanam]

Trees cannot become cell towers.

You need a new camera.

[Chavita123]

pass the blunt around, quit hoarding it.

[Joseelico77]

watch this video to cure your dna

The 144,000 and The Song of Moses (Part 7 of 12)

[thesilverfalcon]

(Cont.)

Try shooting this same spot at a different time of day, when the sun is elsewhere. Do you get the same results? Try this with a different camera. Maybe all of these things which you call radiation and energy fields are simply camera effects which you allow your imagination to change into absurd conspiracys. I do not wish to rebuke you, but I implore you to at least consider this possibility and open your eyes to what could be a much less sinister world than you make it out to be.