Clearly expressed this is an excellent interview by Jonathan. It is highly educational and highlights the important fact that a majority of both Israeli's and Palestinians want peace.
I like the way Jonathan dealt with the concept that Israeli's are 'happy' with the current situation, that this concept is simply false. He also explains why it is wrong to assume that a right wing government is automatically precluded from making concessions for peace, which viewers need constant reminding of.
Isn't it typical that the BBC asks Sacerdoti, "What would the Israeli government have to concede in order for these talks to succeed?" You can't imagine the BBC asking a Palestinian representative what THEY might have to concede. The interviewer then goes on to refer to Netanyahu as "a right wing prime minister", with the clear implication that this automatically puts him in the wrong. The rest of the interview was equally slanderous. Oh well, at least they interviewed a Zionist,
Clearly expressed this is an excellent interview by Jonathan. It is highly educational and highlights the important fact that a majority of both Israeli's and Palestinians want peace.
I like the way Jonathan dealt with the concept that Israeli's are 'happy' with the current situation, that this concept is simply false. He also explains why it is wrong to assume that a right wing government is automatically precluded from making concessions for peace, which viewers need constant reminding of.
ctigernews 1 year ago
Isn't it typical that the BBC asks Sacerdoti, "What would the Israeli government have to concede in order for these talks to succeed?" You can't imagine the BBC asking a Palestinian representative what THEY might have to concede. The interviewer then goes on to refer to Netanyahu as "a right wing prime minister", with the clear implication that this automatically puts him in the wrong. The rest of the interview was equally slanderous. Oh well, at least they interviewed a Zionist,
adlew 1 year ago